Chun Eun Hee, Kim Youn Jin, Woo Jae Hee
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(23):e3828. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003828.
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of intravenous (I.V.) dexamethasone with that of perineural dexamethasone on the prolongation of analgesic duration of single-shot interscalene brachial plexus blocks (SISB) in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery. We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients undergoing elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery with ultrasound-guided SISB were enrolled and randomized into 2 groups. A total volume of 12 mL of the study drug was prepared with a final concentration of 0.5% ropivacaine. In the I.V. group, patients received SISB using ropivacaine 5 mg mL with normal saline (control) with dexamethasone 5 mg I.V. injection. In the perineural group, patients received SISB using ropivacaine 5 mg mL with dexamethasone 5 mg, with normal saline 1 mL I.V. injection. The primary outcome was the time to the first analgesic request, defined as the time between the end of the operation and the first request of analgesics by the patient. The secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction scores, side effects, and neurological symptoms. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 groups using a computer-generated randomization table. An anesthesiologist blinded to the group assignments prepared the solutions for injection. The patients and the investigator participating in the study were also blinded to the group assignments. One hundred patients were randomized. Data were analyzed for 99 patients. One case in the I.V. group was converted to open surgery and was therefore not included in the study. Perineural dexamethasone significantly prolonged analgesic duration (median, standard error: 1080 minutes, 117.5 minutes) compared with I.V. dexamethasone (810 minutes, 48.1 minutes) (P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in side effects, neurological symptoms, or changes in blood glucose values between the 2 groups. Our results show that perineural dexamethasone 5 mg is more effective than I.V. dexamethasone 5 mg with regard to analgesic duration of SISB for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
本研究旨在比较静脉注射地塞米松与神经周围注射地塞米松对接受关节镜下肩部手术患者单次肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞(SISB)镇痛持续时间的延长效果。我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。将接受超声引导下SISB的择期关节镜下肩部手术患者纳入并随机分为2组。用最终浓度为0.5%的罗哌卡因配制12 mL研究药物。在静脉注射组,患者使用含5 mg/mL罗哌卡因的生理盐水(对照)加5 mg静脉注射地塞米松进行SISB。在神经周围组,患者使用含5 mg/mL罗哌卡因加5 mg地塞米松,并静脉注射1 mL生理盐水进行SISB。主要结局是首次镇痛需求时间,定义为手术结束至患者首次要求镇痛的时间。次要结局包括患者满意度评分、副作用和神经症状。使用计算机生成的随机表将患者随机分配到2组中的1组。一名对分组情况不知情的麻醉医生准备注射溶液。参与研究的患者和研究者也对分组情况不知情。100例患者被随机分组。对99例患者的数据进行了分析。静脉注射组有1例转为开放手术,因此未纳入本研究。与静脉注射地塞米松(810分钟,48.1分钟)相比,神经周围注射地塞米松显著延长了镇痛持续时间(中位数,标准误:1080分钟,117.5分钟)(P = 0.02)。两组在副作用、神经症状或血糖值变化方面无显著差异。我们的结果表明,对于关节镜下肩部手术的SISB镇痛持续时间,5 mg神经周围注射地塞米松比5 mg静脉注射地塞米松更有效。