Salamat Sara, Hutchings John, Kwong Clemens, Magnussen John, Hancock Mark J
Physical Therapy Department,Tehran university of Medical Sciences, District 12, Enghelab, Pich-e-Shemiran, Tehran, Iran.
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Talavera Rd North Ryde, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia.
Springerplus. 2016 Jun 22;5(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2542-5. eCollection 2016.
To assess the relationship between quantitative measures of disc height and signal intensity with the Pfirrmann disc degeneration scoring system and to test the inter-rater reliability of the quantitative measures.
Participants were 76 people who had recently recovered from their last episode of acute low back pain and underwent MRI scan on a single 3T machine. At all 380 lumbar discs, quantitative measures of disc height and signal intensity were made by 2 independent raters and compared to Pfirrmann scores from a single radiologist. For quantitative measures of disc height and signal intensity a "raw" score and 2 adjusted ratios were calculated and the relationship with Pfirrmann scores was assessed. The inter-tester reliability of quantitative measures was also investigated.
There was a strong linear relationship between quantitative disc signal intensity and Pfirrmann scores for grades 1-4, but not for grades 4 and 5. For disc height only, Pfirrmann grade 5 had significantly reduced disc height compared to all other grades. Results were similar regardless of whether raw or adjusted scores were used. Inter-rater reliability for the quantitative measures was excellent (ICC > 0.97).
Quantitative measures of disc signal intensity were strongly related to Pfirrmann scores from grade 1 to 4; however disc height only differentiated between grade 4 and 5 Pfirrmann scores. Using adjusted ratios for quantitative measures of disc height or signal intensity did not significantly alter the relationship with Pfirrmann scores.
评估椎间盘高度和信号强度的定量测量值与Pfirrmann椎间盘退变评分系统之间的关系,并测试定量测量值的评分者间可靠性。
研究对象为76名近期从最后一次急性下背痛发作中康复的患者,他们在一台3T磁共振成像仪上接受了扫描。在所有380个腰椎椎间盘中,由两名独立的评分者对椎间盘高度和信号强度进行定量测量,并与一名放射科医生给出的Pfirrmann评分进行比较。对于椎间盘高度和信号强度的定量测量,计算了一个“原始”分数和两个调整后的比率,并评估了它们与Pfirrmann评分的关系。还研究了定量测量的测试者间可靠性。
1-4级椎间盘的定量信号强度与Pfirrmann评分之间存在很强的线性关系,但4级和5级之间不存在。仅对于椎间盘高度,与所有其他级别相比,Pfirrmann 5级的椎间盘高度显著降低。无论使用原始分数还是调整后的分数,结果相似。定量测量的评分者间可靠性极佳(组内相关系数>0.97)。
椎间盘信号强度的定量测量与1至4级的Pfirrmann评分密切相关;然而,椎间盘高度仅在Pfirrmann 4级和5级评分之间有所区分。使用调整后的比率来定量测量椎间盘高度或信号强度,并未显著改变与Pfirrmann评分的关系。