Suppr超能文献

椎间盘高度和椎间盘信号强度的定量测量与椎间盘退变Pfirrmann评分之间的关系。

The relationship between quantitative measures of disc height and disc signal intensity with Pfirrmann score of disc degeneration.

作者信息

Salamat Sara, Hutchings John, Kwong Clemens, Magnussen John, Hancock Mark J

机构信息

Physical Therapy Department,Tehran university of Medical Sciences, District 12, Enghelab, Pich-e-Shemiran, Tehran, Iran.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Talavera Rd North Ryde, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia.

出版信息

Springerplus. 2016 Jun 22;5(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2542-5. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the relationship between quantitative measures of disc height and signal intensity with the Pfirrmann disc degeneration scoring system and to test the inter-rater reliability of the quantitative measures.

METHODS

Participants were 76 people who had recently recovered from their last episode of acute low back pain and underwent MRI scan on a single 3T machine. At all 380 lumbar discs, quantitative measures of disc height and signal intensity were made by 2 independent raters and compared to Pfirrmann scores from a single radiologist. For quantitative measures of disc height and signal intensity a "raw" score and 2 adjusted ratios were calculated and the relationship with Pfirrmann scores was assessed. The inter-tester reliability of quantitative measures was also investigated.

RESULTS

There was a strong linear relationship between quantitative disc signal intensity and Pfirrmann scores for grades 1-4, but not for grades 4 and 5. For disc height only, Pfirrmann grade 5 had significantly reduced disc height compared to all other grades. Results were similar regardless of whether raw or adjusted scores were used. Inter-rater reliability for the quantitative measures was excellent (ICC > 0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative measures of disc signal intensity were strongly related to Pfirrmann scores from grade 1 to 4; however disc height only differentiated between grade 4 and 5 Pfirrmann scores. Using adjusted ratios for quantitative measures of disc height or signal intensity did not significantly alter the relationship with Pfirrmann scores.

摘要

目的

评估椎间盘高度和信号强度的定量测量值与Pfirrmann椎间盘退变评分系统之间的关系,并测试定量测量值的评分者间可靠性。

方法

研究对象为76名近期从最后一次急性下背痛发作中康复的患者,他们在一台3T磁共振成像仪上接受了扫描。在所有380个腰椎椎间盘中,由两名独立的评分者对椎间盘高度和信号强度进行定量测量,并与一名放射科医生给出的Pfirrmann评分进行比较。对于椎间盘高度和信号强度的定量测量,计算了一个“原始”分数和两个调整后的比率,并评估了它们与Pfirrmann评分的关系。还研究了定量测量的测试者间可靠性。

结果

1-4级椎间盘的定量信号强度与Pfirrmann评分之间存在很强的线性关系,但4级和5级之间不存在。仅对于椎间盘高度,与所有其他级别相比,Pfirrmann 5级的椎间盘高度显著降低。无论使用原始分数还是调整后的分数,结果相似。定量测量的评分者间可靠性极佳(组内相关系数>0.97)。

结论

椎间盘信号强度的定量测量与1至4级的Pfirrmann评分密切相关;然而,椎间盘高度仅在Pfirrmann 4级和5级评分之间有所区分。使用调整后的比率来定量测量椎间盘高度或信号强度,并未显著改变与Pfirrmann评分的关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验