Suppr超能文献

一种用于对阳性血培养物中的细菌进行直接药敏试验的新快速方法。

A new rapid method for direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria from positive blood cultures.

作者信息

Barnini Simona, Brucculeri Veronica, Morici Paola, Ghelardi Emilia, Florio Walter, Lupetti Antonella

机构信息

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.

Dipartimento di Ricerca Traslazionale e delle Nuove Tecnologie in Medicina e Chirurgia, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Microbiol. 2016 Aug 12;16(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0805-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of the causative agent(s) of bloodstream infections can lead to prompt appropriate antimicrobial therapy. To shorten species identification, in this study bacteria were recovered from monomicrobial blood cultures by serum separator tubes and spotted onto the target plate for direct MALDI-TOF MS identification. Proper antibiotics were selected for direct AST based on species identification. In order to obtain rapid AST results, bacteria were recovered from positive blood cultures by two different protocols: by serum separator tubes (further referred to as PR1), or after a short-term subculture in liquid medium (further referred to as PR2). The results were compared with those obtained by the method currently used in our laboratory consisting in identification by MALDI-TOF and AST by Vitek 2 or Sensititre on isolated colonies.

RESULTS

The direct MALDI-TOF method concordantly identified with the current method 97.5 % of the Gram-negative bacteria and 96.1 % of the Gram-positive cocci contained in monomicrobial blood cultures. The direct AST by PR1 and PR2 for all isolate/antimicrobial agent combinations was concordant/correct with the current method for 87.8 and 90.5 % of Gram-negative bacteria and for 93.1 and 93.8 % of Gram-positive cocci, respectively. In particular, 100 % categorical agreement was found with levofloxacin for Enterobacteriaceae by both PR1 and PR2, and 99.0 and 100 % categorical agreement was observed with linezolid for Gram-positive cocci by PR1 and PR2, respectively. There was no significant difference in accuracy between PR1 and PR2 for Gram-negative bacteria and Gram-positive cocci.

CONCLUSIONS

This newly described method seems promising for providing accurate AST results. Most importantly, these results would be available in a few hours from blood culture positivity, which would help clinicians to promptly confirm or streamline an effective antibiotic therapy in patients with bloodstream infections.

摘要

背景

血流感染病原体的快速鉴定和抗菌药物敏感性试验(AST)可实现及时、恰当的抗菌治疗。为缩短菌种鉴定时间,本研究采用血清分离管从单一微生物血培养物中分离细菌,并点种到靶板上进行直接基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)鉴定。根据菌种鉴定结果选择合适的抗生素进行直接AST。为获得快速AST结果,通过两种不同方案从阳性血培养物中分离细菌:采用血清分离管(以下简称PR1),或在液体培养基中短期传代培养后(以下简称PR2)。将结果与我们实验室目前使用的方法进行比较,该方法包括通过MALDI-TOF进行鉴定以及通过Vitek 2或Sensititre对分离菌落进行AST。

结果

直接MALDI-TOF方法与当前方法对单一微生物血培养物中97.5%的革兰阴性菌和96.1%的革兰阳性球菌鉴定结果一致。PR1和PR2对所有分离菌/抗菌药物组合的直接AST与当前方法对革兰阴性菌的一致性/正确率分别为87.8%和90.5%,对革兰阳性球菌的一致性/正确率分别为93.1%和93.8%。特别是,PR1和PR2对肠杆菌科细菌的左氧氟沙星鉴定结果均为100%完全一致,PR1和PR2对革兰阳性球菌的利奈唑胺鉴定结果分别为99.0%和100%完全一致。对于革兰阴性菌和革兰阳性球菌,PR1和PR2在准确性上无显著差异。

结论

这种新描述的方法似乎有望提供准确的AST结果。最重要的是,从血培养阳性起数小时内即可获得这些结果,这将有助于临床医生迅速确认或简化血流感染患者的有效抗生素治疗方案。

相似文献

4
Performance of microbial identification by MALDI-TOF MS and susceptibility testing by VITEK 2 from positive blood cultures after minimal incubation on solid media.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Nov;36(11):2201-2206. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3046-0. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
7
Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-positive cocci in blood cultures by direct inoculation into the BD Phoenix system.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Jul;16(7):986-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03006.x. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
9

引用本文的文献

2
Getting Up to Speed: Rapid Pathogen and Antimicrobial Resistance Diagnostics in Sepsis.
Microorganisms. 2024 Sep 3;12(9):1824. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12091824.
4
Evaluation of Direct Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing from Positive Flagged Blood Cultures in Sepsis Patients.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Apr;28(4):387-392. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24687.
5
Evaluation of three protocols for direct susceptibility testing for Gram-negative rods from flagged positive blood culture bottles.
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Apr 2;12(4):e0308123. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03081-23. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
8
Optimized identification of microorganisms directly from positive blood cultures by MALDI-TOF to improve antimicrobial treatment.
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2022 Aug;35(4):362-369. doi: 10.37201/req/135.2021. Epub 2022 May 23.
9
Evaluation of the Performance of Direct Susceptibility Test by VITEK-2 from Positively Flagged Blood Culture Broth for Gram-Negative Bacilli.
J Lab Physicians. 2021 Jul 9;13(4):374-379. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1732489. eCollection 2021 Dec.

本文引用的文献

3
New rapid methods cannot replace the current method to diagnose bloodstream infections.
J Med Microbiol. 2014 May;63(Pt 5):767-769. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.069161-0. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
5
PNA-FISH assays for early targeted bacteraemia treatment.
J Microbiol Methods. 2013 Nov;95(2):253-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
6
Evaluation of the Alfred 60/AST device as a screening test for urinary tract infections.
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Oct;51(10):3406-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01126-13. Epub 2013 Jul 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验