Yates T, Edwardson C L, Henson J, Gray L J, Ashra N B, Troughton J, Khunti K, Davies M J
Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester-Loughborough Diet, Lifestyle and Physical Activity Biomedical Research Unit (BRU), Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester, UK.
Diabet Med. 2017 May;34(5):698-707. doi: 10.1111/dme.13254. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
This study aimed to investigate whether an established behavioural intervention, Walking Away from Type 2 Diabetes, is effective at promoting and sustaining increased walking activity when delivered within primary care.
Cluster randomized controlled trial involving 10 general practices recruited from Leicestershire, UK, in 2009-2010. Eight hundred and eight (36% female) individuals with a high risk of Type 2 diabetes mellitus, identified through a validated risk score, were included. Participants in five practices were randomized to Walking Away from Type 2 Diabetes, a pragmatic 3-h group-based structured education programme incorporating pedometer use with annual follow-on refresher sessions. The primary outcome was accelerometer assessed ambulatory activity (steps/day) at 12 months. Longer term maintenance was assessed at 24 and 36 months. Results were analysed using generalized estimating equation models, accounting for clustering.
Complete accelerometer data for the primary outcome were available for 571 (71%) participants. Increases in ambulatory activity of 411 steps/day [95% confidence interval (CI): 117, 704] and self-reported vigorous-intensity physical activity of 218 metabolic equivalent min/week (95% CI: 6, 425) at 12 months were observed in the intervention group compared with control; differences between groups were not sustained at 36 months. No differences between groups were observed for markers of cardiometabolic health. Replacing missing data with multiple imputation did not affect the results.
A pragmatic low-resource group-based structured education programme with pedometer use resulted in modest increases in ambulatory activity compared with control conditions after 12 months when implemented within a primary care setting to those at high risk of Type 2 diabetes mellitus; however, the results were not maintained over 36 months.
本研究旨在调查一种既定的行为干预措施——“摆脱2型糖尿病步行计划”,在初级保健环境中实施时,对于促进和维持增加的步行活动是否有效。
2009年至2010年,在英国莱斯特郡招募了10家全科诊所进行整群随机对照试验。纳入了808名(36%为女性)通过有效风险评分确定为2型糖尿病高危人群。五家诊所的参与者被随机分配到“摆脱2型糖尿病步行计划”,这是一个实用的基于小组的3小时结构化教育项目,包括使用计步器以及每年的后续复习课程。主要结局是12个月时通过加速度计评估的日常活动量(步数/天)。在24个月和36个月时评估长期维持情况。使用广义估计方程模型分析结果,并考虑聚类因素。
571名(71%)参与者可获得主要结局的完整加速度计数据。与对照组相比,干预组在12个月时日常活动量增加了411步/天[95%置信区间(CI):117,704],自我报告的剧烈强度体力活动增加了218代谢当量分钟/周(95%CI:6,425);36个月时两组间差异未持续存在。两组在心脏代谢健康指标方面未观察到差异。用多重填补法替代缺失数据不影响结果。
在初级保健环境中,对2型糖尿病高危人群实施的一个实用的、基于低资源小组的结构化教育项目,结合计步器使用,与对照条件相比,12个月后日常活动量有适度增加;然而,36个月后结果未得到维持。