Bae Seongman, Kim Min-Chul, Park Su-Jin, Kim Hee Sueng, Sung Heungsup, Kim Mi-Na, Kim Sung-Han, Lee Sang-Oh, Choi Sang-Ho, Woo Jun Hee, Kim Yang Soo, Chong Yong Pil
Department of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Oct 21;60(11):6774-6779. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00839-16. Print 2016 Nov.
Emerging resistance to colistin in clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates is of growing concern. Since current treatment options for these strains are extremely limited, we investigated the in vitro activities of various antimicrobial combinations against colistin-resistant A. baumannii Nine clinical isolates (8 from bacteremia cases and 1 from a pneumonia case) of colistin-resistant A. baumannii were collected in Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea, between January 2010 and December 2012. To screen for potential synergistic effects, multiple combinations of two antimicrobials among 12 commercially available agents were tested using the multiple-combination bactericidal test (MCBT). Checkerboard tests were performed to validate these results. Among the 9 colistin-resistant strains, 6 were pandrug resistant and 3 were extensively drug resistant. With MCBT, the most effective combinations were colistin-rifampin and colistin-teicoplanin; both combinations showed synergistic effect against 8 of 9 strains. Colistin-aztreonam, colistin-meropenem, and colistin-vancomycin combinations showed synergy against seven strains. Colistin was the most common constituent of antimicrobial combinations that were active against colistin-resistant A. baumannii Checkerboard tests were then conducted in colistin-based combinations. Notably, colistin-rifampin showed synergism against all nine strains (100%). Both colistin-vancomycin and colistin-teicoplanin showed either synergy or partial synergy. Colistin combined with another β-lactam agent (aztreonam, ceftazidime, or meropenem) showed a relatively moderate effect. Colistin combined with ampicillin-sulbactam, tigecycline, amikacin, azithromycin, or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole demonstrated limited synergism. Using MCBT and checkerboard tests, we found that only colistin-based combinations, particularly those with rifampin, glycopeptides, or β-lactams, may confer therapeutic benefits against colistin-resistant A. baumannii.
临床分离的鲍曼不动杆菌对黏菌素出现的耐药性日益引起关注。由于目前针对这些菌株的治疗选择极为有限,我们研究了各种抗菌药物组合对耐黏菌素鲍曼不动杆菌的体外活性。2010年1月至2012年12月期间,在韩国首尔峨山医院收集了9株耐黏菌素鲍曼不动杆菌的临床分离株(8株来自菌血症病例,1株来自肺炎病例)。为筛选潜在的协同效应,使用多组合杀菌试验(MCBT)对12种市售药物中的两种抗菌药物的多种组合进行了测试。进行棋盘法试验以验证这些结果。在9株耐黏菌素菌株中,6株为泛耐药,3株为广泛耐药。通过MCBT,最有效的组合是黏菌素-利福平以及黏菌素-替考拉宁;这两种组合对9株菌株中的8株均显示出协同效应。黏菌素-氨曲南、黏菌素-美罗培南以及黏菌素-万古霉素组合对7株菌株显示出协同效应。黏菌素是对耐黏菌素鲍曼不动杆菌有活性的抗菌药物组合中最常见的成分。随后对基于黏菌素的组合进行了棋盘法试验。值得注意的是,黏菌素-利福平对所有9株菌株均显示出协同效应(100%)。黏菌素-万古霉素和黏菌素-替考拉宁均显示出协同或部分协同效应。黏菌素与另一种β-内酰胺类药物(氨曲南、头孢他啶或美罗培南)联合显示出相对中等的效果。黏菌素与氨苄西林-舒巴坦、替加环素、阿米卡星、阿奇霉素或甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑联合显示出有限的协同效应。通过MCBT和棋盘法试验,我们发现只有基于黏菌素的组合,特别是那些与利福平、糖肽类或β-内酰胺类联合的组合,可能对耐黏菌素鲍曼不动杆菌具有治疗益处。