Beydoun M A, Beydoun H A, Mode N, Dore G A, Canas J A, Eid S M, Zonderman A B
NIH Biomedical Research Center, National Institute on Aging, IRP, 251 Bayview Blvd. Suite 100 Room #:04B118, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 22;16(1):1113. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3744-z.
Studies uncovering factors beyond socio-economic status (SES) that would explain racial and ethnic disparities in mortality are scarce.
Using prospective cohort data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), we examined all-cause and cause-specific mortality disparities by race, mediation through key factors and moderation by age (20-49 vs. 50+), sex and poverty status. Cox proportional hazards, discrete-time hazards and competing risk regression models were conducted (N = 16,573 participants, n = 4207 deaths, Median time = 170 months (1-217 months)).
Age, sex and poverty income ratio-adjusted hazard rates were higher among Non-Hispanic Blacks (NHBs) vs. Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). Within the above-poverty young men stratum where this association was the strongest, the socio-demographic-adjusted HR = 2.59, p < 0.001 was only partially attenuated by SES and other factors (full model HR = 2.08, p = 0.003). Income, education, diet quality, allostatic load and self-rated health, were among key mediators explaining NHB vs. NHW disparity in mortality. The Hispanic paradox was observed consistently among women above poverty (young and old). NHBs had higher CVD-related mortality risk compared to NHW which was explained by factors beyond SES. Those factors did not explain excess risk among NHB for neoplasm-related death (fully adjusted HR = 1.41, 95 % CI: 1.02-2.75, p = 0.044). Moreover, those factors explained the lower risk of neoplasm-related death among MA compared to NHW, while CVD-related mortality risk became lower among MA compared to NHW upon multivariate adjustment.
In sum, racial/ethnic disparities in all-cause and cause-specific mortality (particularly cardiovascular and neoplasms) were partly explained by socio-demographic, SES, health-related and dietary factors, and differentially by age, sex and poverty strata.
揭示社会经济地位(SES)之外能够解释死亡率种族和民族差异的因素的研究很少。
利用第三次全国健康与营养检查调查(NHANES III)的前瞻性队列数据,我们按种族、通过关键因素进行中介以及按年龄(20 - 49岁与50岁以上)、性别和贫困状况进行调节,研究了全因死亡率和特定原因死亡率差异。进行了Cox比例风险、离散时间风险和竞争风险回归模型分析(N = 16573名参与者,n = 4207例死亡,中位时间 = 170个月(1 - 217个月))。
在调整年龄、性别和贫困收入比后,非西班牙裔黑人(NHBs)的风险率高于非西班牙裔白人(NHW)。在贫困线以上的年轻男性阶层中这种关联最强,经社会人口统计学调整后的HR = 2.59,p < 0.001,仅部分被SES和其他因素减弱(完全模型HR = 2.08,p = 0.003)。收入、教育、饮食质量、应激负荷和自评健康是解释NHBs与NHW死亡率差异的关键中介因素。在贫困线以上的女性(年轻和年老)中一致观察到西班牙裔悖论。与NHW相比,NHBs有更高的心血管疾病相关死亡率风险,这可由SES之外的因素解释。这些因素不能解释NHBs中肿瘤相关死亡的额外风险(完全调整后的HR = 1.41,95% CI:1.02 - 2.75,p = 0.044)。此外,这些因素解释了与NHW相比,墨西哥裔美国人(MA)中肿瘤相关死亡风险较低的原因,而在多变量调整后,与NHW相比,MA中与心血管疾病相关的死亡率风险降低。
总之,全因死亡率和特定原因死亡率(特别是心血管疾病和肿瘤)的种族/民族差异部分可由社会人口统计学、SES、健康相关和饮食因素解释,且因年龄、性别和贫困阶层而异。