Suppr超能文献

他汀类药物用于成人心血管疾病预防:美国预防服务工作组的证据报告和系统评价

Statins for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

作者信息

Chou Roger, Dana Tracy, Blazina Ian, Daeges Monica, Jeanne Thomas L

机构信息

The Pacific Northwest Evidence-Based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.

Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.

出版信息

JAMA. 2016 Nov 15;316(19):2008-2024. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15629.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States, may be potentially preventable with statin therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review benefits and harms of statins for prevention of CVD to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE (from 1946), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (from 1991), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (from 2005) to June 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials of statins vs placebo, fixed-dose vs titrated statins, and higher- vs lower-intensity statins in adults without prior cardiovascular events.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

One investigator abstracted data, a second checked data for accuracy, and 2 investigators independently assessed study quality using predefined criteria. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

All-cause mortality, CVD-related morbidity or mortality, and harms.

RESULTS

Nineteen trials (n = 71 344 participants [range, 95-17 802]; mean age, 51-66 years) compared statins vs placebo or no statin. Statin therapy was associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.86 [95% CI, 0.80 to 0.93]; I2 = 0%; absolute risk difference [ARD], -0.40% [95% CI, -0.64% to -0.17%]), cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.88]; I2 = 54%; ARD, -0.43% [95% CI, -0.75% to -0.11%]), stroke (RR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.82]; I2 = 0; ARD, -0.38% [95% CI, -0.53% to -0.23%]), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.71]; I2 = 0%; ARD, -0.81% [95% CI, -1.19 to -0.43%]), and composite cardiovascular outcomes (RR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.78]; I2 = 36%; ARD, -1.39% [95% CI, -1.79 to -0.99%]). Relative benefits appeared consistent in demographic and clinical subgroups, including populations without marked hyperlipidemia (total cholesterol level <200 mg/dL); absolute benefits were higher in subgroups at higher baseline risk. Statins were not associated with increased risk of serious adverse events (RR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.94 to 1.04]), myalgias (RR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.16]), or liver-related harms (RR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.35]). In pooled analysis, statins were not associated with increased risk of diabetes (RR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.91 to 1.20]), although statistical heterogeneity was present (I2 = 52%), and 1 trial found high-intensity statins associated with increased risk (RR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.49]). No trial directly compared titrated vs fixed-dose statins, and there were no clear differences based on statin intensity.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In adults at increased CVD risk but without prior CVD events, statin therapy was associated with reduced risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and CVD events, with greater absolute benefits in patients at greater baseline risk.

摘要

重要性

心血管疾病(CVD)是美国死亡和发病的主要原因,他汀类药物治疗可能具有潜在的预防作用。

目的

系统评价他汀类药物预防CVD的益处和危害,为美国预防服务工作组提供参考。

数据来源

截至2016年6月的Ovid MEDLINE(始于1946年)、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(始于1991年)和Cochrane系统评价数据库(始于2005年)。

研究选择

针对无心血管疾病既往史的成年人,比较他汀类药物与安慰剂、固定剂量与滴定剂量他汀类药物以及高强度与低强度他汀类药物的随机临床试验。

数据提取与综合分析

由一名研究人员提取数据,另一名研究人员检查数据准确性,两名研究人员使用预定义标准独立评估研究质量。采用随机效应荟萃分析合并数据。

主要结局和指标

全因死亡率、CVD相关发病率或死亡率以及危害。

结果

19项试验(n = 71344名参与者[范围95 - 17802];平均年龄51 - 66岁)比较了他汀类药物与安慰剂或不用他汀类药物的情况。他汀类药物治疗与全因死亡率风险降低相关(风险比[RR],0.86[95%置信区间,0.80至0.93];I² = 0%;绝对风险差异[ARD],-0.40%[95%置信区间,-0.64%至-0.17%])、心血管死亡率(RR,0.69[95%置信区间,0.54至0.88];I² = 54%;ARD,-0.43%[95%置信区间,-0.75%至-0.11%])、中风(RR,0.71[95%置信区间,0.62至0.82];I² = 0;ARD,-0.38%[95%置信区间,-0.53%至-0.23%])、心肌梗死(RR,0.64[95%置信区间,0.57至0.71];I² = 0%;ARD,-0.81%[95%置信区间,-1.19至-0.43%])以及复合心血管结局(RR,0.70[95%置信区间,0.63至0.78];I² = 36%;ARD,-1.39%[95%置信区间,-1.79至-0.99%])。在人口统计学和临床亚组中,包括无明显高脂血症(总胆固醇水平<200mg/dL)的人群,相对益处似乎一致;在基线风险较高的亚组中,绝对益处更高。他汀类药物与严重不良事件风险增加无关(RR,0.99[95%置信区间,0.94至1.04])、肌痛(RR,0.96[95%置信区间,0.79至1.16])或肝脏相关危害(RR,1.10[95%置信区间,0.90至1.35])。在汇总分析中,他汀类药物与糖尿病风险增加无关(RR,1.05[95%置信区间,0.91至1.20]),尽管存在统计学异质性(I² = 52%)且1项试验发现高强度他汀类药物与风险增加相关(RR,1.25[95%置信区间,1.05至1.49])。没有试验直接比较滴定剂量与固定剂量的他汀类药物,且基于他汀类药物强度没有明显差异。

结论及相关性

在CVD风险增加但无心血管疾病既往史的成年人中,他汀类药物治疗与全因和心血管死亡率及CVD事件风险降低相关,在基线风险较高的患者中绝对益处更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验