Johnson Douglas B, Pectasides Eirini, Feld Emily, Ye Fei, Zhao Shilin, Johnpulle Romany, Merritt Ryan, McDermott David F, Puzanov Igor, Lawrence Donald, Sosman Jeffrey A, Buchbinder Elizabeth, Sullivan Ryan J
*Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN †Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center ‡Dana-Farber Cancer Institute §Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
J Immunother. 2017 Jan;40(1):31-35. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000148.
Novel agents targeting immune checkpoint molecules or mutated BRAF are active therapeutic options for patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma. However, the most effective first-line treatment and the optimal sequencing of these agents have not been well characterized. To explore this, we retrospectively assessed 114 patients from 4 centers with advanced, BRAF-mutant melanoma who received anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 antibodies. We evaluated clinical outcomes, including objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) to initial and subsequent therapies in patients that received anti-PD-1 first (n=56) versus those that received BRAF±MEK inhibitors (BRAFi) first (n=58). Median OS was similar between these groups (27.5 vs. 40.3 mo, P=0.71). Patients who progressed on anti-PD-1 during the study timeframe had worse outcomes after starting subsequent BRAFi than those who had not received prior anti-PD-1 (median PFS 5 vs. 7.4 mo, median OS 10.6 vs. 40.3 mo). Similarly, patients who previously progressed on BRAFi had seemingly inferior outcomes after starting anti-PD-1 compared with those without prior BRAFi, including ORR (25% vs. 41%), median PFS (2.8 vs. 10.6 mo) and median OS (8.2 vs. 27.6 mo). Notably, patients who benefited >6 months from BRAFi had superior ORR to subsequent anti-PD-1 compared with those with more rapid progression (<6 mo) on BRAFi (34% vs. 15%, P=0.04). We conclude that either BRAFi or anti-PD-1 may be effective regardless of treatment sequence in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma, but clinical outcomes to front-line therapy are superior. In addition, we suggest a shared "responder phenotype" between BRAFi and anti-PD-1.
针对免疫检查点分子或突变型BRAF的新型药物是BRAF突变型黑色素瘤患者积极的治疗选择。然而,这些药物最有效的一线治疗方案及其最佳用药顺序尚未得到充分明确。为了探究这一点,我们回顾性评估了来自4个中心的114例晚期BRAF突变型黑色素瘤患者,这些患者接受了抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)/PD-L1抗体治疗。我们评估了临床结局,包括接受抗PD-1治疗为先(n=56)与接受BRAF±MEK抑制剂(BRAFi)治疗为先(n=58)的患者对初始及后续治疗的客观缓解率(ORR)、总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。两组的中位OS相似(27.5个月对40.3个月,P=0.71)。在研究期间接受抗PD-1治疗后病情进展的患者,在开始后续BRAFi治疗后的结局比未接受过抗PD-1治疗的患者更差(中位PFS 5个月对7.4个月,中位OS 10.6个月对40.3个月)。同样地,先前接受BRAFi治疗后病情进展的患者,在开始抗PD-1治疗后的结局似乎比未接受过BRAFi治疗的患者更差,包括ORR(25%对41%)、中位PFS(2.8个月对10.6个月)和中位OS(8.2个月对27.6个月)。值得注意的是,与在BRAFi治疗中进展较快(<6个月)的患者相比,从BRAFi治疗中获益>6个月的患者对后续抗PD-1治疗的ORR更高(34%对15%,P=0.04)。我们得出结论,对于BRAF突变型黑色素瘤患者,无论治疗顺序如何,BRAFi或抗PD-1可能都是有效的,但一线治疗的临床结局更好。此外,我们提示BRAFi和抗PD-1之间存在共同的“反应者表型”。