Kulaylat Audrey S, Hollenbeak Christopher S, Stewart David B
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.
Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 May;24(5):1281-1288. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5681-6. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer, the interpretation of surgical pathology poses difficulties in deciding the need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a survival benefit to providing AC in patients with node-negative disease on surgical pathology.
Patients with clinical stage II and III rectal adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and definitive surgical resection from 2006 to 2012 were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. Patients were stratified by both receipt of AC and nodal status on surgical pathology. Propensity score matching was used to form two cohorts (AC vs. no AC) with otherwise balanced characteristics. Overall survival was compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariable survival analysis was performed by a Weibull model.
After propensity score matching, 4172 patients who received adjuvant therapy (2645 node negative and 1527 node positive) and 4172 patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy (3063 node negative and 1109 node positive) were identified. Among patients with either node-negative or node-positive disease, the use of AC was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival. These results were also observed after using a multivariable survival model to control for clinical stage as well as patient- and facility-related characteristics.
In both patients with node-negative and node-positive disease on surgical pathology, the use of AC is associated with a survival benefit. In the absence of contraindications, AC should continue to be routinely recommended to patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancers.
直肠癌新辅助放化疗后,手术病理结果在判断是否需要辅助化疗(AC)方面存在困难。本研究的目的是确定手术病理显示淋巴结阴性的患者接受AC是否有生存获益。
在国家癌症数据库中识别出2006年至2012年接受新辅助放化疗及根治性手术切除的临床II期和III期直肠腺癌患者。根据是否接受AC以及手术病理的淋巴结状态对患者进行分层。采用倾向评分匹配法形成两个特征均衡的队列(AC组与非AC组)。通过Kaplan-Meier分析比较总生存期,并采用Weibull模型进行多变量生存分析。
倾向评分匹配后,识别出4172例接受辅助治疗的患者(2645例淋巴结阴性,1527例淋巴结阳性)和4172例未接受辅助治疗的患者(3063例淋巴结阴性,1109例淋巴结阳性)。在淋巴结阴性或阳性的患者中,使用AC均与总生存期的显著改善相关。在使用多变量生存模型控制临床分期以及患者和机构相关特征后,也观察到了这些结果。
对于手术病理显示淋巴结阴性和阳性的患者,使用AC均有生存获益。在没有禁忌证的情况下,对于局部晚期直肠癌新辅助放化疗后的患者,应继续常规推荐使用AC。