Suppr超能文献

脓毒症的医院相关费用:系统评价。

Hospital-related cost of sepsis: A systematic review.

机构信息

Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Hospital Pharmacy, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.

Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Hospital Pharmacy, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

J Infect. 2017 Feb;74(2):107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This article systematically reviews research on the costs of sepsis and, as a secondary aim, evaluates the quality of economic evaluations reported in peer-reviewed journals.

METHODS

We systematically searched the MEDLINE, National Health Service (Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Economic Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment), Cost-effectiveness Analysis Registry and Web of Knowledge databases for studies published between January 2005 and June 2015. We selected original articles that provided cost and cost-effectiveness analyses, defined sepsis and described their cost calculation method. Only studies that considered index admissions and re-admissions in the first 30 days were published in peer-reviewed journals and used standard treatments were considered. All costs were adjusted to 2014 US dollars. Medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for various costs of sepsis were calculated. The quality of economic studies was assessed using the Drummond 10-item checklist.

RESULTS

Overall, 37 studies met our eligibility criteria. The median of the mean hospital-wide cost of sepsis per patient was $32,421 (IQR $20,745-$40,835), and the median of the mean ICU cost of sepsis per patient was $27,461 (IQR $16,007-$31,251). Overall, the quality of economic studies was low.

CONCLUSIONS

Estimates of the hospital-related costs of sepsis varied considerably across the included studies depending on the method used for cost calculation, the type of sepsis and the population that was examined. A standard model for conducting cost improve the quality of studies on the costs of sepsis.

摘要

目的

本文系统地回顾了脓毒症成本的研究,并作为次要目标,评估了同行评议期刊中报告的经济评估的质量。

方法

我们系统地检索了 MEDLINE、英国国家卫生服务(系统评价、经济评估和卫生技术评估摘要)、成本效益分析登记处和 Web of Knowledge 数据库,以获取 2005 年 1 月至 2015 年 6 月期间发表的研究。我们选择了提供成本和成本效益分析的原始文章,定义了脓毒症并描述了他们的成本计算方法。只有考虑了前 30 天内的索引入院和再入院、并使用标准治疗的同行评议期刊发表的研究才被认为是合格的。所有成本均调整为 2014 年美元。计算了脓毒症各种成本的中位数和四分位距(IQR)。使用 Drummond 10 项清单评估经济研究的质量。

结果

总体而言,有 37 项研究符合我们的入选标准。脓毒症患者平均医院总成本的中位数为 32421 美元(IQR 20745-40835),脓毒症患者平均 ICU 成本的中位数为 27461 美元(IQR 16007-31251)。总体而言,经济研究的质量较低。

结论

根据成本计算方法、脓毒症类型和所检查的人群,纳入研究中脓毒症相关医院成本的估计值差异很大。采用标准模型进行成本核算可以提高脓毒症成本研究的质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验