Suppr超能文献

连续血糖监测对使用胰岛素注射的 1 型糖尿病成人血糖控制的影响:DIAMOND 随机临床试验。

Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.

出版信息

JAMA. 2017 Jan 24;317(4):371-378. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19975.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Previous clinical trials showing the benefit of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in the management of type 1 diabetes predominantly have included adults using insulin pumps, even though the majority of adults with type 1 diabetes administer insulin by injection.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of CGM in adults with type 1 diabetes treated with insulin injections.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial conducted between October 2014 and May 2016 at 24 endocrinology practices in the United States that included 158 adults with type 1 diabetes who were using multiple daily insulin injections and had hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels of 7.5% to 9.9%.

INTERVENTIONS

Random assignment 2:1 to CGM (n = 105) or usual care (control group; n = 53).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcome measure was the difference in change in central-laboratory-measured HbA1c level from baseline to 24 weeks. There were 18 secondary or exploratory end points, of which 15 are reported in this article, including duration of hypoglycemia at less than 70 mg/dL, measured with CGM for 7 days at 12 and 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Among the 158 randomized participants (mean age, 48 years [SD, 13]; 44% women; mean baseline HbA1c level, 8.6% [SD, 0.6%]; and median diabetes duration, 19 years [interquartile range, 10-31 years]), 155 (98%) completed the study. In the CGM group, 93% used CGM 6 d/wk or more in month 6. Mean HbA1c reduction from baseline was 1.1% at 12 weeks and 1.0% at 24 weeks in the CGM group and 0.5% and 0.4%, respectively, in the control group (repeated-measures model P < .001). At 24 weeks, the adjusted treatment-group difference in mean change in HbA1c level from baseline was -0.6% (95% CI, -0.8% to -0.3%; P < .001). Median duration of hypoglycemia at less than <70 mg/dL was 43 min/d (IQR, 27-69) in the CGM group vs 80 min/d (IQR, 36-111) in the control group (P = .002). Severe hypoglycemia events occurred in 2 participants in each group.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among adults with type 1 diabetes who used multiple daily insulin injections, the use of CGM compared with usual care resulted in a greater decrease in HbA1c level during 24 weeks. Further research is needed to assess longer-term effectiveness, as well as clinical outcomes and adverse effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02282397.

摘要

重要性

先前的临床试验表明,连续血糖监测(CGM)在 1 型糖尿病的管理中具有益处,这些试验主要包括使用胰岛素泵的成年人,尽管大多数 1 型糖尿病患者通过注射胰岛素来治疗。

目的

确定 CGM 在接受胰岛素注射治疗的 1 型糖尿病成人中的有效性。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项在美国 24 个内分泌科诊所进行的随机临床试验,于 2014 年 10 月至 2016 年 5 月期间开展,共纳入了 158 名接受多次每日胰岛素注射且糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平在 7.5%至 9.9%之间的 1 型糖尿病成人。

干预措施

将参与者随机分配为 CGM 组(n = 105)或常规护理(对照组;n = 53),分配比例为 2:1。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是从基线到 24 周时中心实验室测量的 HbA1c 水平变化的差异。有 18 个次要或探索性终点,其中 15 个在本文中报告,包括在 12 周和 24 周时使用 CGM 测量的 7 天内低于 70mg/dL 的低血糖持续时间。

结果

在 158 名随机参与者中(平均年龄 48 岁[标准差 13];44%为女性;平均基线 HbA1c 水平为 8.6%[标准差 0.6%];中位数糖尿病病程为 19 年[四分位距 10-31 年]),有 155 名(98%)完成了研究。在 CGM 组中,在第 6 个月时,有 93%的人每周使用 CGM 监测血糖 6 天或更多。CGM 组的 HbA1c 从基线降低了 1.1%,在 12 周时达到了 1.0%;对照组分别降低了 0.5%和 0.4%,在 24 周时达到了 0.4%(重复测量模型 P < .001)。在 24 周时,调整后的治疗组间 HbA1c 水平从基线的平均变化差异为-0.6%(95%置信区间,-0.8%至-0.3%;P < .001)。CGM 组中低于 70mg/dL 的低血糖持续时间中位数为 43 分钟/d(IQR,27-69),而对照组为 80 分钟/d(IQR,36-111)(P = .002)。每组各有 2 名参与者发生严重低血糖事件。

结论和相关性

在接受多次每日胰岛素注射的 1 型糖尿病成人中,与常规护理相比,使用 CGM 可在 24 周内使 HbA1c 水平下降更多。需要进一步研究来评估更长期的有效性以及临床结局和不良反应。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT02282397。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验