Suppr超能文献

深度 rTMS 治疗下肢神经性疼痛的疗效:H 线圈和 8 字形线圈的随机、双盲交叉试验。

Efficacy of deep rTMS for neuropathic pain in the lower limb: a randomized, double-blind crossover trial of an H-coil and figure-8 coil.

机构信息

Departments of 1 Neuromodulation and Neurosurgery.

Neurosurgery, and.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;127(5):1172-1180. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS16815. Epub 2017 Feb 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Electrical motor cortex stimulation can relieve neuropathic pain (NP), but its use requires patients to undergo an invasive procedure. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) using a figure-8 coil can relieve NP noninvasively, but its ability to relieve lower limb pain is still limited. Deep rTMS using an H-coil can effectively stimulate deep brain regions and has been widely used for the treatment of various neurological diseases; however, there have been no clinical studies comparing the effectiveness of figure-8 coils and H-coils. This study assessed the clinical effectiveness of 5 once-daily stimulations with H-coils and figure-8 coils in patients with NP. METHODS This randomized, double-blind, 3-way crossover trial examined 18 patients with NP who sequentially received 3 types of stimulations in the M1 for 5 consecutive days; each 5-day stimulation period was followed by a 17-day follow-up period before crossing over to the next type of stimulation. During each rTMS session, patients received a 5-Hz rTMS to the M1 region corresponding to the painful lower limb. The visual analog scale (VAS) and the Japanese version of the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (SF-MPQ2-J) were used to measure pain intensity. The primary outcome was VAS score reduction immediately after and 1 hour after intervention. RESULTS Both the VAS and SF-MPQ2-J showed significant pain improvement immediately after deep rTMS with an H-coil as compared with the sham group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.049, respectively). However, neither outcome measure showed significant pain improvement when using a figure-8 coil. The VAS also showed significant pain improvement 1 hour after deep rTMS with an H-coil (p = 0.004) but not 1 hour after rTMS using a figure-8 coil. None of the patients exhibited any serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS The current findings suggest that the use of deep rTMS with an H-coil in the lower limb region of the M1 in patients with NP was tolerable and could provide significant short-term pain relief. Clinical trial registration no.: UMIN000010536 ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ ).

摘要

目的

电刺激运动皮质可以缓解神经性疼痛(NP),但需要患者进行有创操作。使用 8 字形线圈对初级运动皮质(M1)进行重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)可以无创缓解 NP,但缓解下肢疼痛的效果仍有限。使用 H 线圈的深部 rTMS 可以有效刺激深部脑区,已广泛用于治疗各种神经疾病;然而,目前还没有比较 8 字形线圈和 H 线圈疗效的临床研究。本研究评估了 H 线圈和 8 字形线圈在 NP 患者中 5 次每日刺激的临床疗效。

方法

这是一项随机、双盲、三向交叉试验,纳入了 18 例 NP 患者,他们依次在 M1 接受 3 种刺激,连续 5 天;每种 5 天刺激期后,在交叉到下一种刺激前,有 17 天的随访期。在每次 rTMS 治疗中,患者接受对应于疼痛下肢的 M1 区域的 5Hz rTMS。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)和简式麦吉尔疼痛问卷 2 (SF-MPQ2-J)评估疼痛强度。主要结局为干预后即刻和 1 小时时 VAS 评分的降低。

结果

与假刺激组相比,深部 H 线圈 rTMS 后 VAS 和 SF-MPQ2-J 评分均显著降低(p<0.001 和 p=0.049)。然而,使用 8 字形线圈时,两种结局测量均未显示出显著的疼痛改善。VAS 在深部 H 线圈 rTMS 后 1 小时也显示出显著的疼痛改善(p=0.004),但使用 8 字形线圈 rTMS 后 1 小时则没有。所有患者均未出现任何严重不良事件。

结论

当前研究结果表明,NP 患者 M1 下肢区域使用 H 线圈的深部 rTMS 是可耐受的,并可提供显著的短期疼痛缓解。临床试验注册号:UMIN000010536(http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验