1 Department of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
2 Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Mar;23(3):267-275. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.16334. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are recommended as add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D), with no specific guidance as to timing versus insulin. Furthermore, real-world data assessing GLP-1RA outcomes with or without concurrent insulin therapy are lacking.
To identify glycemic response with GLP-1RAs by insulin use in patients with T2D at 1-year follow-up to inform decisions regarding GLP-1RA use with or without insulin.
This uncontrolled retrospective cohort study included adults with T2D in the Quintiles Electronic Medical Records Database who were newly prescribed GLP-1RA therapy with exenatide once weekly or liraglutide once daily between February 1, 2012, and March 31, 2013 (index period). Primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin A1c (A1c) at 1 year and attainment of A1c < 7%, < 8%, and < 9%. Results were stratified by baseline insulin use, which was defined as no insulin use at baseline, insulin initiated with a GLP-1RA on index date, and insulin prescribed before starting GLP-1RA therapy. Secondary outcomes included 1-year weight, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and blood pressure outcomes for the study population. Adjusted mean (marginal) change in A1c at 1 year was estimated using multivariate linear regression, and multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the likelihood of patients attaining A1c < 7% at follow-up, controlling for potential confounders.
This study included 5,141 patients with a mean (SD) age of 57.0 (10.9) years, 53.5% of whom were females, and with a mean baseline A1c of 8.4% (1.6). Overall, 35.4% had no baseline insulin use, 42.9% were prescribed insulin before starting GLP-1RA therapy, and 21.7% were started on insulin with a GLP-1RA. The adjusted mean A1c reduction at 1 year was 0.75% (95% CI = -0.86 to -0.63) for patients initiating insulin on index date, 0.61% (95% CI = -0.70 to -0.51) for patients with no baseline insulin use, and 0.23% (95% CI = -0.33 to -0.13) for patients prescribed insulin before GLP-1RA therapy. Patients with no baseline insulin or who coinitiated insulin and a GLP-1RA were more likely to attain A1c < 7% at follow-up versus patients prescribed insulin before initiating GLP-1RA therapy (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.08 to 2.09 and OR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.30 to 2.62, respectively). At 1-year follow-up, significant improvements in weight, LDL-C, and blood pressures were also observed.
GLP-1RA therapy was associated with significant improvements in glycemic control when used with or without insulin, as well as reductions in weight and LDL-C overall. However, greater A1c reductions and a higher likelihood of attaining A1c goal levels were observed when a GLP-1RA was initiated alone or with insulin than when a GLP-1RA was added to a regimen that included insulin. GLP-1RA therapy is an effective treatment option when used with or without insulin and may be considered in patients with uncontrolled glycemia.
The study was funded by a collaborative research grant from AstraZeneca. Employees of AstraZeneca participated in most aspects of the study and in manuscript preparation. Nguyen and Hurd are employed by, and hold stock in, AstraZeneca. McAdam-Marx reports participation in the AMCP Diabetes Partnership and has stock ownership in GlaxoSmithKline. Study concept and design were contributed by Nguyen, McAdam-Marx, and Singhal, along with Unni and Schauerhamer. Singhal, Unni, Nguyen, and McAdam-Marx collected the data, with assistance from Schauerhamer and Hurd, and data interpretation was performed by Unni, Hurd, McAdam-Marx, Singhal, Nguyen, and Schauerhamer. The manuscript was written by Singhal, Schauerhamer, Unni, and McAdam-Marx, along with Nguyen and Hurd, and revised by McAdam-Marx, Singhal, Unni, and Nguyen, along with Schauerhamer and Hurd.
胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)被推荐作为未经控制的 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的附加治疗方法,与胰岛素的使用时机没有具体的指导。此外,缺乏关于同时使用 GLP-1RA 和胰岛素治疗或不使用胰岛素治疗的 GLP-1RA 结果的真实世界数据。
在 1 年随访时,通过胰岛素使用评估 T2D 患者使用 GLP-1RA 的血糖反应,以便为是否同时使用 GLP-1RA 和胰岛素提供决策依据。
这是一项未对照的回顾性队列研究,纳入了 Quintiles 电子病历数据库中在 2012 年 2 月 1 日至 2013 年 3 月 31 日期间新开始使用每周一次的艾塞那肽或每日一次的利拉鲁肽的 T2D 成年患者。主要结局是 1 年时的血红蛋白 A1c(A1c)变化和达到 A1c<7%、<8%和<9%的情况。结果按基线时是否使用胰岛素进行分层,定义为基线时无胰岛素使用、指数日期开始使用 GLP-1RA 时开始使用胰岛素和开始 GLP-1RA 治疗前开始使用胰岛素。次要结局包括研究人群的 1 年体重、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和血压结果。使用多变量线性回归估计 1 年时 A1c 的调整平均(边际)变化,使用多变量逻辑回归控制潜在混杂因素,估计患者在随访时达到 A1c<7%的可能性。
这项研究纳入了 5141 名平均(标准差)年龄为 57.0(10.9)岁的患者,其中 53.5%为女性,基线 A1c 平均为 8.4%(1.6)。总体而言,35.4%的患者基线时无胰岛素使用,42.9%的患者在开始 GLP-1RA 治疗前开始使用胰岛素,21.7%的患者在开始 GLP-1RA 治疗时同时开始使用胰岛素。指数日期开始使用胰岛素的患者在 1 年时 A1c 降低 0.75%(95%CI=-0.86 至-0.63),基线时无胰岛素使用的患者降低 0.61%(95%CI=-0.70 至-0.51),开始 GLP-1RA 治疗前开始使用胰岛素的患者降低 0.23%(95%CI=-0.33 至-0.13)。与开始 GLP-1RA 治疗前开始使用胰岛素的患者相比,基线时无胰岛素或同时开始使用胰岛素和 GLP-1RA 的患者更有可能在随访时达到 A1c<7%(OR=1.50,95%CI=1.08 至 2.09;OR=1.85,95%CI=1.30 至 2.62)。在 1 年随访时,还观察到体重、LDL-C 和血压的显著改善。
当 GLP-1RA 与胰岛素联合使用或不联合使用时,均可显著改善血糖控制,并降低体重和 LDL-C。然而,与开始 GLP-1RA 治疗时已开始使用胰岛素的患者相比,单独开始 GLP-1RA 治疗或与胰岛素同时开始治疗的患者 A1c 降低幅度更大,达到 A1c 目标水平的可能性更高。当与胰岛素联合使用或不联合使用时,GLP-1RA 治疗是一种有效的治疗选择,可考虑用于血糖控制不佳的患者。
这项研究由阿斯利康的合作研究资助。阿斯利康的员工参与了研究的大部分内容和手稿的准备。Nguyen 和 Hurd 受雇于阿斯利康,并持有其股票。McAdam-Marx 报告参与了 AMCP 糖尿病合作关系,并拥有葛兰素史克的股票。研究概念和设计由 Nguyen、McAdam-Marx 和 Singhal 提出,Unni 和 Schauerhamer 参与其中。Singhal、Unni、Nguyen 和 McAdam-Marx 收集数据,Schauerhamer 和 Hurd 提供协助,Unni、Hurd、McAdam-Marx、Singhal、Nguyen 和 Schauerhamer 进行数据解释。手稿由 Singhal、Schauerhamer、Unni 和 McAdam-Marx 撰写,同时还有 Nguyen 和 Hurd,以及修订版由 McAdam-Marx、Singhal、Unni 和 Nguyen 完成,同时还有 Schauerhamer 和 Hurd。