Itchins Malinda, Ascierto Paolo A, Menzies Alexander M, Oatley Meredith, Lo Serigne, Douraghi-Zadeh Dariush, Harrington Timmothy, Maher Richard, Grimaldi Antonio M, Guminski Alexander
aDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital bDepartment of Medical Oncology Melanoma Institute Australia cDepartment of Medical Oncology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia dDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori 'Fondazione Pascale', Naples, Campania, Italy.
Melanoma Res. 2017 Jun;27(3):243-250. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000343.
Metastatic uveal melanoma is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. To date, systemic therapy has been ineffective; however, there are few data on the benefits of anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD-1 antibodies in sequence with liver-directed therapy. A retrospective cohort analysis was carried out on 37 consecutive patients managed in a tertiary referral centre examining the safety and efficacy of treatment; patterns of care; and impact on survival. The sequential treatment with transarterial chemotherapy (TAC), systemic immunotherapy (IT) and systemic chemotherapy was reviewed. In all, 18 patients in the series received sequential therapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 17 months (n=37), which compared favourably with previously reported series. Patients treated with TAC first or second line had an overall progression-free survival (PFS) of 9 months (n=29) and IT PFS 7 months (n=26). The overall response rate (ORR) for TAC first line was 26% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 65% (n=23). ORR for IT first line was 7%, DCR 77% (n=14). Second-line (cross-over) IT ORR was 16%, DCR 58% (n=12). For second-line (cross-over) TAC, ORR was 50% and DCR was 66% (n=6). Toxicity was manageable. There were no cases of autoimmune hepatitis. In this retrospective small series analysis in uveal melanoma, liver-directed therapy and IT in sequence have shown to be active and reasonably well tolerated. Further prospective clinical trials should clarify the role of these treatments and their potential survival benefit.
转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤是一种罕见的恶性肿瘤,预后较差。迄今为止,全身治疗一直无效;然而,关于抗CTLA4或抗PD-1抗体与肝靶向治疗序贯使用的益处的数据很少。对一家三级转诊中心连续治疗的37例患者进行了回顾性队列分析,以研究治疗的安全性和有效性、护理模式以及对生存的影响。回顾了经动脉化疗(TAC)、全身免疫治疗(IT)和全身化疗的序贯治疗。该系列中共有18例患者接受了序贯治疗。中位总生存期(OS)为17个月(n = 37),与先前报道的系列相比具有优势。接受一线或二线TAC治疗的患者的总无进展生存期(PFS)为9个月(n = 29),IT治疗的PFS为7个月(n = 26)。一线TAC的总缓解率(ORR)为26%,疾病控制率(DCR)为65%(n = 23)。一线IT的ORR为7%,DCR为77%(n = 14)。二线(交叉)IT的ORR为16%,DCR为58%(n = 12)。对于二线(交叉)TAC,ORR为50%,DCR为66%(n = 6)。毒性是可控的。没有自身免疫性肝炎病例。在这项关于葡萄膜黑色素瘤的回顾性小系列分析中,肝靶向治疗和IT序贯使用已显示出有效性且耐受性良好。进一步的前瞻性临床试验应阐明这些治疗的作用及其潜在的生存益处。