Suppr超能文献

采用术后加速康复模式,为接受植入式乳房重建术的女性带来了更好的康复体验。

Improved Recovery Experience Achieved for Women Undergoing Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Model.

作者信息

Dumestre Danielle O, Webb Carmen E, Temple-Oberle Claire

机构信息

Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

From the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, and the Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Mar;139(3):550-559. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003056.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery was compared with traditional recovery after surgery for postmastectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction.

METHODS

Length of stay, emergency room visits, and complications within 30 days of surgery were compared among three groups: traditional recovery after surgery, transition (some elements of enhanced recovery protocol, not transitioned to outpatient care), and enhanced recovery after surgery (day surgery, provided with standardized perioperative education and multimodal analgesia). Prospective data collection allowed quality-of-recovery assessment using a validated questionnaire for enhanced recovery/transition groups. Results were statistically analyzed (analysis of variance/chi-square).

RESULTS

The traditional recovery, transition, and enhanced recovery cohorts comprised 29, 11, and 29 patients, respectively. No significant differences were present regarding age, smoking status, preoperative radiation, single stage direct-to-implant versus tissue expander, bilateral versus unilateral surgery, or immediate versus delayed reconstruction among groups. Average length of stay was 1.6 nights in both the traditional recovery and transition groups, compared with 0 nights in the enhanced recovery group (p < 0.001). Enhanced recovery patients had less severe pain (p = 0.02) and nausea (p = 0.01), and better enjoyed their food (p = 0.0002) and felt more rested (p = 0.02) than their transition counterparts. There were no differences in the number of emergency room visits among the three groups (p = 0.88). There was no difference in the rate of hematoma (p = 0.36), infection requiring intravenous antibiotics (p = 0.36), or infection requiring explantation (p = 0.36) among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

An enhanced recovery protocol for alloplastic breast reconstruction treated patients safely, with improved patient satisfaction and same-day discharge and with no increase in complications.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

摘要

背景

比较了乳房切除术后异体乳房重建手术的快速康复方案与传统康复方案。

方法

比较了三组患者的住院时间、急诊就诊次数和术后30天内的并发症情况:传统术后康复组、过渡组(采用了快速康复方案的一些要素,但未过渡到门诊护理)和快速康复组(日间手术,接受标准化围手术期教育和多模式镇痛)。前瞻性数据收集允许使用经过验证的问卷对快速康复/过渡组进行康复质量评估。对结果进行了统计分析(方差分析/卡方检验)。

结果

传统康复组、过渡组和快速康复组分别有29例、11例和29例患者。各组在年龄、吸烟状况、术前放疗、一期直接植入假体与组织扩张器、双侧与单侧手术、即刻与延迟重建方面均无显著差异。传统康复组和过渡组的平均住院时间均为1.6晚,而快速康复组为0晚(p<0.001)。与过渡组患者相比,快速康复组患者疼痛较轻(p=0.02)、恶心较少(p=0.01),饮食更好(p=0.0002),感觉更有精神(p=0.02)。三组的急诊就诊次数无差异(p=0.88)。三组在血肿发生率(p=0.36)、需要静脉使用抗生素的感染发生率(p=0.36)或需要取出假体的感染发生率(p=0.36)方面均无差异。

结论

异体乳房重建手术的快速康复方案安全有效,提高了患者满意度,实现了当日出院,且并发症未增加。

临床问题/证据水平:治疗性,III级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验