Lynch Stephanie K, Abràmoff Michael D
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA; Iowa Institute for Biomedical Imaging, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA; Department of Veterans Affairs, 601 US-6, Iowa City, IA 52246, USA.
Vision Res. 2017 Oct;139:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
Since 1875, controversy has ensued over whether ocular diabetic complications are primarily vasculopathic or neuropathic in nature. Here, we discuss the historical context by which diabetic retinopathy (DR) came to be considered a primary vasculopathy, in contrast to more recent data suggesting the importance of diabetic retinal neurodegeneration (DRN) as the primary manifestation of ocular diabetic damage. Unsurprisingly, DRN parallels other diabetic complications related to neuropathy. In general, there are three possible relationships between microvascular DR and DRN: i) microvasculopathy causes neurodegeneration; ii) neurodegeneration causes microvasculopathy or iii) they are mutually independent. The authors' group has recently produced experimental data showing that DRN precedes even the earliest manifestations of DR microvasculopathy. In combination with earlier studies showing that focal implicit time delays predicted future development of DR microvasculopathy in the same location, relationships i) and iii) are unlikely. As such, ii) is the most likely relationship: DRN is a cause of DR. Granted, additional studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis and elucidate the mechanism of diabetes-induced neurodegeneration. We conclude this review by proposing experimental approaches to test the hypothesis that DRN causes DR. If confirmed, this new paradigm may lead to earlier detection of ocular diabetic damage and earlier treatment of early DR, thereby preventing visual loss in people with diabetes.
自1875年以来,关于眼部糖尿病并发症本质上主要是血管病变还是神经病变一直存在争议。在此,我们讨论糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)被视为主要血管病变的历史背景,与之形成对比的是,最近的数据表明糖尿病视网膜神经变性(DRN)作为眼部糖尿病损害的主要表现具有重要意义。不出所料,DRN与其他与神经病变相关的糖尿病并发症相似。一般来说,微血管性DR与DRN之间存在三种可能的关系:i)微血管病变导致神经变性;ii)神经变性导致微血管病变;或iii)它们相互独立。作者团队最近得出的实验数据表明,DRN甚至早于DR微血管病变的最早表现出现。结合早期研究表明局部隐性时间延迟可预测同一部位DR微血管病变的未来发展,关系i)和iii)不太可能成立。因此,ii)是最有可能的关系:DRN是DR的一个病因。诚然,还需要更多研究来证实这一假设并阐明糖尿病诱导神经变性的机制。我们通过提出实验方法来检验DRN导致DR这一假设来结束本综述。如果得到证实,这一新范式可能会导致更早地检测出眼部糖尿病损害并更早地治疗早期DR,从而预防糖尿病患者的视力丧失。