Kwon Jung-Hwan, Chang Sein, Hong Sang Hee, Shim Won Joon
Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Oil and POPs Research Group, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Geoje, Republic of Korea.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 May;13(3):494-499. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1906.
Despite a recent boom in research on the environmental fate, distribution, and harmful effects of chemical substances associated with marine plastic debris, no consensus has been reached on whether chemicals originating from microplastics cause serious environmental harm. For the risk assessment of chemical contaminants associated with microplastics, it would be useful to group organic chemicals into 2 categories: additives and nonadditives. Whereas plastic particles are not likely to be diffuse sources of chemicals that are not intentionally added to plastic products, continuous leaching of additives would result in higher concentrations, at least at a local scale. Unlike plasticizers and flame retardants, which have been relatively well investigated, antioxidants and photostabilizers have been rarely studied, even though many of them are highly hydrophobic and are not readily biodegradable. More research on the fate and effects of chemicals via microplastics should focus on those additives. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:494-499. © 2017 SETAC.
尽管最近关于与海洋塑料垃圾相关的化学物质的环境归宿、分布和有害影响的研究蓬勃发展,但对于源自微塑料的化学物质是否会造成严重的环境危害,尚未达成共识。对于与微塑料相关的化学污染物的风险评估,将有机化学品分为两类会很有用:添加剂和非添加剂。虽然塑料颗粒不太可能是未故意添加到塑料制品中的化学物质的扩散源,但添加剂的持续浸出会导致更高的浓度,至少在局部范围内如此。与已经得到相对充分研究的增塑剂和阻燃剂不同,抗氧化剂和光稳定剂很少被研究,尽管它们中的许多具有高度疏水性且不易生物降解。关于通过微塑料的化学物质的归宿和影响的更多研究应集中在那些添加剂上。《综合环境评估与管理》2017年;13:494 - 499。© 2017 SETAC。