Suppr超能文献

单侧与双侧终末期踝关节骨关节炎患者的压力中心分布情况

Center of pressure profiles in unilateral compared to bilateral end-stage ankle osteoarthritis patients.

作者信息

Gladish Jonathan R, Powell Douglas W, Allison Lindsey E, Queen Robin M

机构信息

Kevin P. Granata Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.

Musculoskeletal Analysis Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.

出版信息

J Orthop Res. 2017 Dec;35(12):2749-2754. doi: 10.1002/jor.23585. Epub 2017 May 23.

Abstract

Ankle osteoarthritis (OA) compromises ankle joint stability in regards to static balance. Unilateral and bilateral osteoarthritis patients often exhibit different limb-loading patterns during static balance tasks. Symmetrical loading has been posited to improve balance performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify balance performance in both ankle osteoarthritis patient groups. Twenty-two unilateral and twenty-one bilateral ankle osteoarthritis patients performed three 10-s quiet standing trials with their feet together. Ground reaction force data were collected from force platforms with one under each foot. Center of pressure excursion in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions as well as the resultant center of pressure were calculated using custom Matlab software. A 2 × 2 repeated measures ANOVA with Cohen's d were used to analyze the differences between groups (unilateral vs. bilateral) and between limbs (affected vs. unaffected) (α = 0.05). No significant differences were found between limbs or groups in either the anteroposterior or mediolateral direction for any measured variable. Though not statistically different, moderate to large effect sizes were observed for mean resultant distance between unilateral and bilateral (d = 0.096, d: 1.0) as well as anteroposterior excursion (p = 0.077, d: 1.731) and mean velocity (p = 0.084, d: 1.50) between affected and unaffected limbs. These large effect sizes suggested clinically relevant differences may exist, particularly in the anteroposterior direction. These findings may suggest that center of pressure is a better measure of postural strategy while center of mass measures may be more representative of postural steadiness. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:2749-2754, 2017.

摘要

踝关节骨关节炎(OA)会损害踝关节在静态平衡方面的稳定性。单侧和双侧骨关节炎患者在静态平衡任务中通常表现出不同的肢体负荷模式。有观点认为对称负荷可改善平衡能力。因此,本研究的目的是量化这两组踝关节骨关节炎患者的平衡能力。22名单侧踝关节骨关节炎患者和21名双侧踝关节骨关节炎患者双脚并拢进行了三次10秒的安静站立试验。通过置于每只脚下的测力平台收集地面反作用力数据。使用定制的Matlab软件计算前后方向和内外侧方向的压力中心偏移以及合成压力中心。采用2×2重复测量方差分析和科恩d值来分析组间(单侧与双侧)和肢体间(患侧与未患侧)的差异(α = 0.05)。在任何测量变量的前后方向或内外侧方向上,肢体或组间均未发现显著差异。尽管无统计学差异,但观察到单侧和双侧之间的平均合成距离(d = 0.096,d:1.0)以及患侧与未患侧肢体之间的前后偏移(p = 0.077,d:1.731)和平均速度(p = 0.084,d:1.50)存在中度至较大的效应量。这些较大的效应量表明可能存在临床相关差异,尤其是在前后方向上。这些发现可能表明压力中心是姿势策略的更好指标,而质心测量可能更能代表姿势稳定性。©2017骨科研究协会。由威利期刊公司出版。《矫形外科学研究》35:2749 - 2754,2017年。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验