Naslund John A, Kim Sunny Jung, Aschbrenner Kelly A, McCulloch Laura J, Brunette Mary F, Dallery Jesse, Bartels Stephen J, Marsch Lisa A
Health Promotion Research Center at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States; The Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States.
Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.
Addict Behav. 2017 Oct;73:81-93. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 2.
Popular social media could extend the reach of smoking cessation efforts. In this systematic review, our objectives were: 1) to determine whether social media interventions for smoking cessation are feasible, acceptable, and potentially effective; 2) to identify approaches for recruiting subjects; and 3) to examine the specific intervention design components and strategies employed to promote user engagement and retention.
We searched Scopus, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science through July 2016 and reference lists of relevant articles. Included studies described social media interventions for smoking cessation and must have reported outcomes related to feasibility, acceptability, usability, or smoking-related outcomes.
We identified 7 studies (all were published since 2014) that enrolled 9755 participants (median=136 [range 40 to 9042]). Studies mainly used Facebook (n=4) or Twitter (n=2), and emerged as feasible and acceptable. Five studies reported smoking-related outcomes such as greater abstinence, reduction in relapse, and an increase in quit attempts. Most studies (n=6) recruited participants using online or Facebook advertisements. Tailored content, targeted reminders, and moderated discussions were used to promote participant engagement. Three studies found that active participation through posting comments or liking content may be associated with improved outcomes. Retention ranged from 35% to 84% (median=70%) across the included studies.
Our review highlights the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of social media interventions for smoking cessation. Future research should continue to explore approaches for promoting user engagement and retention, and whether sustained engagement translates to clinically meaningful smoking cessation outcomes.
流行的社交媒体可以扩大戒烟努力的覆盖范围。在这项系统评价中,我们的目标是:1)确定用于戒烟的社交媒体干预措施是否可行、可接受且可能有效;2)确定招募受试者的方法;3)研究为促进用户参与和留存而采用的具体干预设计组成部分和策略。
我们检索了截至2016年7月的Scopus、Medline、EMBASE、Cochrane Central、PsychINFO、CINAHL和Web of Science以及相关文章的参考文献列表。纳入的研究描述了用于戒烟的社交媒体干预措施,并且必须报告了与可行性、可接受性、可用性或与吸烟相关的结果。
我们确定了7项研究(均自2014年以来发表),共纳入9755名参与者(中位数=136 [范围40至9042])。研究主要使用Facebook(n = 4)或Twitter(n = 2),且被证明是可行和可接受的。五项研究报告了与吸烟相关的结果,如更高的戒烟率、复发率降低和戒烟尝试增加。大多数研究(n = 6)通过在线或Facebook广告招募参与者。使用定制内容、有针对性的提醒和主持讨论来促进参与者的参与。三项研究发现,通过发表评论或点赞内容进行积极参与可能与改善结果相关。纳入研究的留存率在35%至84%之间(中位数=70%)。
我们的评价强调了用于戒烟的社交媒体干预措施的可行性、可接受性和初步有效性。未来的研究应继续探索促进用户参与和留存的方法,以及持续参与是否能转化为具有临床意义的戒烟结果。