Chemical Engineering Department, Loughborough University, LE11 3TU, UK.
Chemical Engineering Department, Loughborough University, LE11 3TU, UK.
Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2017 Nov;249:100-133. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 14.
Against a backdrop of global antibiotic resistance and increasing awareness of the importance of the human microbiota, there has been resurgent interest in the potential use of bacteriophages for therapeutic purposes, known as phage therapy. A number of phage therapy phase I and II clinical trials have concluded, and shown phages don't present significant adverse safety concerns. These clinical trials used simple phage suspensions without any formulation and phage stability was of secondary concern. Phages have a limited stability in solution, and undergo a significant drop in phage titre during processing and storage which is unacceptable if phages are to become regulated pharmaceuticals, where stable dosage and well defined pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are de rigueur. Animal studies have shown that the efficacy of phage therapy outcomes depend on the phage concentration (i.e. the dose) delivered at the site of infection, and their ability to target and kill bacteria, arresting bacterial growth and clearing the infection. In addition, in vitro and animal studies have shown the importance of using phage cocktails rather than single phage preparations to achieve better therapy outcomes. The in vivo reduction of phage concentration due to interactions with host antibodies or other clearance mechanisms may necessitate repeated dosing of phages, or sustained release approaches. Modelling of phage-bacterium population dynamics reinforces these points. Surprisingly little attention has been devoted to the effect of formulation on phage therapy outcomes, given the need for phage cocktails, where each phage within a cocktail may require significantly different formulation to retain a high enough infective dose. This review firstly looks at the clinical needs and challenges (informed through a review of key animal studies evaluating phage therapy) associated with treatment of acute and chronic infections and the drivers for phage encapsulation. An important driver for formulation and encapsulation is shelf life and storage of phage to ensure reproducible dosages. Other drivers include formulation of phage for encapsulation in micro- and nanoparticles for effective delivery, encapsulation in stimuli responsive systems for triggered controlled or sustained release at the targeted site of infection. Encapsulation of phage (e.g. in liposomes) may also be used to increase the circulation time of phage for treating systemic infections, for prophylactic treatment or to treat intracellular infections. We then proceed to document approaches used in the published literature on the formulation and stabilisation of phage for storage and encapsulation of bacteriophage in micro- and nanostructured materials using freeze drying (lyophilization), spray drying, in emulsions e.g. ointments, polymeric microparticles, nanoparticles and liposomes. As phage therapy moves forward towards Phase III clinical trials, the review concludes by looking at promising new approaches for micro- and nanoencapsulation of phages and how these may address gaps in the field.
在全球抗生素耐药性日益增强和人们对人类微生物组重要性认识不断提高的背景下,噬菌体治疗作为一种潜在的治疗方法再次受到关注。一些噬菌体治疗的 I 期和 II 期临床试验已经结束,结果表明噬菌体不会带来显著的不良安全问题。这些临床试验使用了简单的噬菌体悬浮液,没有任何制剂,噬菌体的稳定性是次要的。噬菌体在溶液中的稳定性有限,在加工和储存过程中噬菌体效价会大幅下降,如果噬菌体要成为受监管的药物,这是不可接受的,因为稳定的剂量和明确的药代动力学和药效学是必要的。动物研究表明,噬菌体治疗效果取决于感染部位递送的噬菌体浓度(即剂量)及其靶向和杀死细菌的能力,从而阻止细菌生长并清除感染。此外,体外和动物研究表明,使用噬菌体鸡尾酒而不是单一噬菌体制剂来实现更好的治疗效果非常重要。由于与宿主抗体或其他清除机制的相互作用,噬菌体在体内的浓度会降低,这可能需要重复给药或采用持续释放方法。噬菌体-细菌群体动力学模型强化了这些观点。令人惊讶的是,尽管需要使用噬菌体鸡尾酒,但由于每个噬菌体在鸡尾酒中可能需要显著不同的制剂来保持足够高的感染剂量,因此人们对制剂对噬菌体治疗效果的影响关注甚少。本综述首先着眼于与治疗急性和慢性感染相关的临床需求和挑战(通过对评估噬菌体治疗的关键动物研究的综述得知),以及噬菌体封装的驱动因素。制剂和封装的一个重要驱动因素是噬菌体的保质期和储存,以确保可重复的剂量。其他驱动因素包括为有效递送至感染部位而将噬菌体封装在微纳米颗粒中、封装在刺激响应系统中以触发靶向感染部位的受控或持续释放。噬菌体的封装(例如,包封在脂质体中)也可用于增加噬菌体的循环时间,以治疗全身性感染、预防性治疗或治疗细胞内感染。然后,我们继续记录已发表文献中用于噬菌体的制剂和稳定化的方法,以及使用冷冻干燥(冻干)、喷雾干燥、乳液(例如软膏)、聚合物微球、纳米颗粒和脂质体将噬菌体封装在微纳米结构材料中的方法。随着噬菌体治疗向 III 期临床试验推进,该综述最后着眼于噬菌体的微纳米封装的有前景的新方法,以及这些方法如何解决该领域的空白。