Suppr超能文献

在群体中做出更好的决策。

Making better decisions in groups.

作者信息

Bang Dan, Frith Chris D

机构信息

Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.

Interacting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Aug 16;4(8):170193. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170193. eCollection 2017 Aug.

Abstract

We review the literature to identify common problems of decision-making in individuals and groups. We are guided by a Bayesian framework to explain the interplay between past experience and new evidence, and the problem of exploring the space of hypotheses about all the possible states that the world could be in and all the possible actions that one could take. There are strong biases, hidden from awareness, that enter into these psychological processes. While biases increase the efficiency of information processing, they often do not lead to the most appropriate action. We highlight the advantages of group decision-making in overcoming biases and searching the hypothesis space for good models of the world and good solutions to problems. Diversity of group members can facilitate these achievements, but diverse groups also face their own problems. We discuss means of managing these pitfalls and make some recommendations on how to make better group decisions.

摘要

我们回顾文献以确定个体和群体决策中的常见问题。我们以贝叶斯框架为指导,来解释过去经验与新证据之间的相互作用,以及探索关于世界可能处于的所有可能状态和一个人可能采取的所有可能行动的假设空间的问题。在这些心理过程中存在着意识不到的强烈偏差。虽然偏差提高了信息处理的效率,但它们往往不会导致最恰当的行动。我们强调群体决策在克服偏差以及在假设空间中寻找世界的良好模型和问题的良好解决方案方面的优势。群体成员的多样性可以促进这些成果,但多样化的群体也面临自身的问题。我们讨论了应对这些陷阱的方法,并就如何做出更好的群体决策提出了一些建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b83/5579088/d3cdf707cee1/rsos170193-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验