Fonseca Andreia, Silva Rita, Rato Inês, Neves Ana Raquel, Peixoto Carla, Ferraz Zita, Ramalho Inês, Carocha Ana, Félix Nisa, Valdoleiros Sandra, Galvão Ana, Gonçalves Daniela, Curado Joana, Palma Maria João, Antunes Isabel Lobo, Clode Nuno, Graça Luís Mendes
Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia. Hospital de Santa Maria. Centro Hospital Lisboa Norte. Lisboa. Portugal.
Maternidade Bissaya Barreto. Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra. Coimbra. Portugal.
Acta Med Port. 2017 Jun 30;30(6):479-484. doi: 10.20344/amp.7920.
The best route of delivery for the term breech fetus is still controversial. We aim to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between vaginal and cesarean term breech deliveries.
Multicentric retrospective cohort study of singleton term breech fetuses delivered vaginally or by elective cesarean section from January 2012 - October 2014. Primary outcomes were maternal and neonatal morbidity or mortality.
Sixty five breech fetuses delivered vaginally were compared to 1262 delivered by elective cesarean. Nulliparous women were more common in the elective cesarean group (69.3% vs 24.6%; p < 0.0001). Gestational age at birth was significantly lower in the vaginal delivery group (38 ± 1 weeks vs 39 ± 0.8 weeks; p = 0.0029) as was birth weight (2928 ± 48.4 g vs 3168 ± 11.3 g; p < 0.0001). Apgar scores below seven on the first and fifth minutes were more likely in the vaginal delivery group (1st minute: 18.5% vs 5.9%; p = 0.0006; OR 3.6 [1.9 - 7.0]; 5th minute: 3.1% vs 0.2%; p = 0.0133; OR 20.0 [2.8 - 144.4]), as was fetal trauma (3.1% vs 0.3%: p = 0.031; OR 9.9 [1.8-55.6]). Neither group had cases of fetal acidemia. Admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, maternal postpartum hemorrhage and the incidence of other obstetric complications were similar between groups.
Although vaginal breech delivery was associated with lower Apgar scores and higher incidence of fetal trauma, overall rates of such events were low. Admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and maternal outcomes were similar.
Both delivery routes seem equally valid, neither posing high maternal or neonatal complications' incidence.
足月儿臀位分娩的最佳途径仍存在争议。我们旨在比较阴道分娩和剖宫产足月儿臀位分娩的母婴结局。
对2012年1月至2014年10月期间经阴道或择期剖宫产分娩的单胎足月儿臀位进行多中心回顾性队列研究。主要结局是母婴发病率或死亡率。
将65例经阴道分娩的臀位胎儿与1262例择期剖宫产分娩的胎儿进行比较。初产妇在择期剖宫产组中更为常见(69.3%对24.6%;p<0.0001)。阴道分娩组的出生孕周明显更低(38±1周对39±0.8周;p=0.0029),出生体重也是如此(2928±48.4克对3168±11.3克;p<0.0001)。阴道分娩组在出生后第1分钟和第5分钟时阿氏评分低于7分的可能性更高(第1分钟:18.5%对5.9%;p=0.0006;比值比3.6[1.9-7.0];第5分钟:3.1%对0.2%;p=0.0133;比值比20.0[2.8-144.4]),胎儿创伤也是如此(3.1%对0.3%:p=0.031;比值比9.9[1.8-55.6])。两组均无胎儿酸血症病例。两组之间新生儿重症监护病房收治率、产妇产后出血及其他产科并发症发生率相似。
虽然阴道臀位分娩与较低的阿氏评分和较高的胎儿创伤发生率相关,但此类事件的总体发生率较低。新生儿重症监护病房收治率和产妇结局相似。
两种分娩途径似乎同样有效,均未造成高的母婴并发症发生率。