Department of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Germany; McGill University Health Centre, Division of Rheumatology and Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Palliative Care Center, Malteser Krankenhaus Seliger Gerhard Bonn/Rhein-Sieg, Germany; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Sep 22;114(38):627-634. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0627.
There are conflicting interpretations of the evidence regarding the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of cannabinoids in pain management and palliative medicine.
We conducted a systematic review (SR) of systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCT) and prospective long-term observational studies of the use of cannabinoids in pain management and palliative medicine. Pertinent publications from January 2009 to January 2017 were retrieved by a selective search in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Medline. The methodological quality of the SRs was assessed with the AMSTAR instrument, and the clinical relevance of quantitative data syntheses was assessed according to the standards of the Cochrane Collaboration.
Of the 750 publications identified, 11 SRs met the inclusion criteria; 3 of them were of high and 8 of moderate methodological quality. 2 prospective long-term observational studies with medical cannabis and 1 with tetrahydrocannabinol/cannabidiol spray (THC/CBD spray) were also analyzed. There is limited evidence for a benefit of THC/CBD spray in the treatment of neuropathic pain. There is inadequate evidence for any benefit of cannabinoids (dronabinol, nabilone, medical cannabis, or THC/CBD spray) to treat cancer pain, pain of rheumatic or gastrointestinal origin, or anorexia in cancer or AIDS. Treatment with cannabis-based medicines is associated with central nervous and psychiatric side effects.
The public perception of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of cannabis-based medicines in pain management and palliative medicine conflicts with the findings of systematic reviews and prospective observational studies conducted according to the standards of evidence-based medicine.
关于大麻素在疼痛管理和姑息医学中的疗效、耐受性和安全性,证据存在相互矛盾的解释。
我们对大麻素在疼痛管理和姑息医学中的应用进行了系统评价(SR),包括系统评价的随机对照试验(RCT)和前瞻性长期观察研究。通过对 Cochrane 系统评价数据库、效应摘要数据库和 Medline 的选择性搜索,检索了 2009 年 1 月至 2017 年 1 月的相关出版物。采用 AMSTAR 工具评估 SR 的方法学质量,并根据 Cochrane 协作网的标准评估定量数据综合的临床相关性。
在确定的 750 篇文献中,有 11 篇符合纳入标准;其中 3 篇为高质量,8 篇为中等质量。还分析了 2 项关于医用大麻的前瞻性长期观察研究和 1 项关于四氢大麻酚/大麻二酚喷雾(THC/CBD 喷雾)的研究。THC/CBD 喷雾治疗神经性疼痛的疗效有一定证据支持。但对于大麻素(屈大麻酚、纳布啡、医用大麻或 THC/CBD 喷雾)治疗癌症疼痛、风湿或胃肠道疼痛、癌症或艾滋病相关厌食症的获益,证据不足。大麻素类药物治疗与中枢神经系统和精神副作用有关。
公众对大麻素类药物在疼痛管理和姑息医学中的疗效、耐受性和安全性的认知与根据循证医学标准进行的系统评价和前瞻性观察研究的结果相矛盾。