Information School, Sheffield University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.
eHealth Institute, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Mar;27(5-6):1276-1286. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14174. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
To investigate reasons for inadequate documentation of vital signs in an electronic health record.
Monitoring vital signs is crucial to detecting and responding to patient deterioration. The ways in which vital signs are documented in electronic health records have received limited attention in the research literature. A previous study revealed that vital signs in an electronic health record were incomplete and inconsistent.
Qualitative study.
Qualitative study. Data were collected by observing (68 hr) and interviewing nurses (n = 11) and doctors (n = 3), and analysed by thematic analysis to examine processes for measuring, documenting and retrieving vital signs in four clinical settings in a 353-bed hospital.
We identified two central reasons for inadequate vital sign documentation. First, there was an absence of firm guidelines for observing patients' vital signs, resulting in inconsistencies in the ways vital signs were recorded. Second, there was a lack of adequate facilities in the electronic health record for recording vital signs. This led to poor presentation of vital signs in the electronic health record and to staff creating paper "workarounds."
This study demonstrated inadequate routines and poor facilities for vital sign documentation in an electronic health record, and makes an important contribution to knowledge by identifying problems and barriers that may occur. Further, it has demonstrated the need for improved facilities for electronic documentation of vital signs.
Patient safety may have been compromised because of poor presentation of vital signs. Thus, our results emphasised the need for standardised routines for monitoring patients. In addition, designers should consult the clinical end-users to optimise facilities for electronic documentation of vital signs. This could have a positive impact on clinical practice and thus improve patient safety.
调查电子病历中生命体征记录不充分的原因。
监测生命体征对于发现和应对患者病情恶化至关重要。生命体征在电子病历中的记录方式在研究文献中受到的关注有限。先前的一项研究表明,电子病历中的生命体征不完整且不一致。
定性研究。
通过观察(68 小时)和访谈护士(n=11)和医生(n=3)收集定性数据,并通过主题分析进行分析,以检查在一家 353 张床位医院的四个临床环境中测量、记录和检索生命体征的过程。
我们确定了生命体征记录不充分的两个主要原因。首先,缺乏观察患者生命体征的明确指南,导致记录生命体征的方式不一致。其次,电子病历中记录生命体征的设施不足。这导致电子病历中生命体征的呈现不佳,并且工作人员创建了纸质“变通办法”。
本研究表明电子病历中生命体征记录的常规和设施不足,通过识别可能出现的问题和障碍,为知识做出了重要贡献。此外,还需要改进电子生命体征记录的设施。
由于生命体征呈现不佳,患者安全可能受到损害。因此,我们的研究结果强调了需要对患者监测进行标准化常规。此外,设计者应咨询临床最终用户,以优化电子生命体征记录的设施。这可能对临床实践产生积极影响,从而提高患者安全性。