Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Health Dallas, UT Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Kirklin Institute for Research in Surgical Outcomes, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 Jun;37(6):715-722. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
Pediatric ventricular assist device (VAD) support as bridge to transplant has improved waitlist survival, but the effects of pre-implant status and VAD-related events on post-transplant outcomes have not been assessed. This study is a linkage analysis between the PediMACS and Pediatric Heart Transplant Study databases to determine the effects of VAD course on post-transplant outcomes.
Database linkage between October 1, 2012 and December 31, 2015 identified 147 transplanted VAD patients, the primary study group. The comparison cohort was composed of 630 PHTS patients without pre-transplant VAD support. The primary outcome was post-transplant survival, with secondary outcomes of post-transplant length of stay, freedom from infection and freedom from rejection.
At implant, the VAD cohort was INTERMACS Profile 1 in 33 (23%), Profile 2 in 89 (63%) and Profile 3 in 14 (10%) patients. The VAD cohort was older, larger, and less likely to have congenital heart disease (p < 0.0001). However, they had greater requirements for inotrope and ventilator support and increased liver and renal dysfunction (p < 0.0001), both of which normalized at transplant after device support. Importantly, there were no differences in 1-year post-transplant survival (96% vs 93%, p = 0.3), freedom from infection (81% vs 79%, p = 0.9) or freedom from rejection (71% vs 74%, p = 0.87) between cohorts.
Pediatric VAD patients have post-transplant outcomes equal to that of medically supported patients, despite greater pre-implant illness severity. Post-transplant survival, hospital length of stay, infection and rejection were not affected by patient acuity at VAD implantation or VAD-related complications. Therefore, VAD as bridge to transplant mitigates severity of illness in children.
儿科心室辅助装置(VAD)支持作为移植桥接已提高了等待移植的存活率,但植入前状态和 VAD 相关事件对移植后结果的影响尚未评估。本研究通过 PediMACS 和儿科心脏移植研究数据库进行链接分析,以确定 VAD 过程对移植后结果的影响。
2012 年 10 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日,通过数据库链接确定了 147 名接受移植 VAD 治疗的患者,作为主要研究组。对照组由 630 名无移植前 VAD 支持的 PHTS 患者组成。主要结局是移植后的存活率,次要结局是移植后的住院时间、感染发生率和排斥反应发生率。
在植入时,VAD 组患者 INTERMACS 评分 1 级 33 例(23%),2 级 89 例(63%),3 级 14 例(10%)。VAD 组患者年龄较大、体型较大,且先天性心脏病的发生率较低(p<0.0001)。然而,他们对正性肌力药物和呼吸机支持的需求更大,肝肾功能障碍更为严重(p<0.0001),但在接受 VAD 支持后,这些功能在移植后均恢复正常。重要的是,两组患者 1 年移植后存活率(96% vs 93%,p=0.3)、感染发生率(81% vs 79%,p=0.9)和排斥反应发生率(71% vs 74%,p=0.87)无差异。
尽管儿科 VAD 患者植入前疾病严重程度更高,但他们的移植后结局与接受药物支持的患者相同。移植后存活率、住院时间、感染和排斥反应均不受 VAD 植入时患者病情严重程度或 VAD 相关并发症的影响。因此,VAD 作为移植桥接减轻了儿童疾病的严重程度。