Suppr超能文献

侧卧位通气联合振动排痰对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验

[Effect of lateral position ventilation combined with vibration sputum drainage on patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled trial].

作者信息

Kong Lingchen, Li Jianzhong, Wu Peng, Xu Jianhua, Li Honglei, Long Haifei, Liu Pan, Wei Fangfang, Peng Wenhong

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Unit, Linyi Central Hospital, Linyi 276400, Shandong, China. Corresponding author: Peng Wenhong, Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Mar;30(3):240-245. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.03.010.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the curative effect of lateral position ventilation combined with vibration sputum drainage on the patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. The patients with ARDS undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV) admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) of Linyi Central Hospital from January 2013 to June 2017 were enrolled, and they were divided into simple ventilation group and combined treatment group according to random number table. The patients in both groups received etiological treatment, protective ventilation strategy, sensitive antibiotics for anti-infection, and calefacient and humidifying treatment. The patients in the simple ventilation group received bilateral discontinuous alternative lateral position ventilation [pressure controlled ventilation (PCV), tidal volume (VT) ≤ 6 mL/kg, the inhaled oxygen concentration (FiO) and positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) was adjusted to maintain the airway plateau pressure (Pplat) ≤ 30 cmHO (1 cmHO = 0.098 kPa)], and those in the combined treatment group received lateral position ventilation combined with vibration sputum drainage, twice a day, 15 minutes each time. The parameters of respiratory function and inflammation as well as excretion of sputum before and after treatment were compared between the two groups, and the complication and prognosis were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients with ARDS were included, 4 patients were excluded because of severe pneumothorax, massive hemorrhage of the digestive tract, or elevated intracranial pressure, so 196 patients were finally enrolled in the analysis. There were 98 patients in the simple ventilation group and the combined treatment group, respectively. There were no significant differences in parameters of respiratory function and inflammation as well as excretion of sputum before treatment between the two groups. After treatment, the above parameters in both groups were improved, and the effect of combined treatment was more significant. Compared with the simple ventilation group, white blood cell count (WBC), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP) at 24 hours of treatment in the combined treatment group were significantly decreased [WBC (×10/L): 9.1±1.6 vs. 11.8±3.6, PCT (μg/L): 14.5±2.4 vs. 22.7±3.2, CRP (mg/L): 32.2±6.3 vs. 67.2±7.2, all P < 0.01], the quantity of sputum excretion was significantly increased (mL: 49.3±12.5 vs. 36.8±11.8, P < 0.01); 72 hours after treatment, the oxygenation index (PaO/FiO) in the combined treatment group was significantly increased [mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 278±28 vs. 238±39, P < 0.01], and PEEP, FiO, airway resistance (Raw) were significantly lowered [PEEP (cmHO): 5±2 vs. 7±3, FiO: 0.40±0.11 vs. 0.49±0.12, Raw (cmHO): 12.8±0.7 vs. 16.2±0.8, all P < 0.01]. There was no significant difference in static lung compliance (Cst) or Pplat between the two groups. Compared with the simple ventilation group, the duration of MV (days: 5.5±3.0 vs. 8.6±2.1), the length of ICU stay (days: 7.5±5.4 vs. 11.3±4.6) and the extraction time of artificial airway (days: 6.6±2.8 vs. 9.4±3.3) in the combined treatment group were significantly shortened (all P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the 28-day mortality rate [4.1% (4/98) vs. 3.1% (3/98)], the rate of tracheotomy [2.0% (2/98) vs. 3.1% (3/98)] or the incidence of I-II skin pressure sore [1.0% (1/98) vs. 2.0% (2/98)] between simple ventilation group and the combined treatment group (all P > 0.05). No artificial airway disappearance, pneumothorax, grade III or IV pressure sore was found in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with lateral position ventilation alone, the treatment of combined with vibration sputum drainage is more effective for improving the respiratory function of patients with ARDS, reducing infection action, shortening the duration of MV and the length of ICU stay, and improve the recovery, promote the rehabitation of patients.

摘要

目的

探讨侧卧位通气联合振动排痰对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的疗效。

方法

进行一项前瞻性随机对照试验。选取2013年1月至2017年6月在临沂市中医医院重症监护病房(ICU)接受机械通气(MV)的ARDS患者,根据随机数字表将其分为单纯通气组和联合治疗组。两组患者均接受病因治疗、保护性通气策略、敏感抗生素抗感染及保暖、湿化治疗。单纯通气组患者采用双侧间断交替侧卧位通气[压力控制通气(PCV),潮气量(VT)≤6 mL/kg,调整吸入氧浓度(FiO)和呼气末正压(PEEP)以维持气道平台压(Pplat)≤30 cmH₂O(1 cmH₂O = 0.098 kPa)],联合治疗组患者接受侧卧位通气联合振动排痰,每日2次,每次15分钟。比较两组治疗前后呼吸功能、炎症指标及痰液排出情况,并记录并发症及预后情况。

结果

共纳入200例ARDS患者,4例因严重气胸、消化道大出血或颅内压升高被排除,最终196例患者纳入分析。单纯通气组和联合治疗组各98例。两组治疗前呼吸功能、炎症指标及痰液排出情况比较,差异无统计学意义。治疗后,两组上述指标均改善,联合治疗组效果更显著。与单纯通气组比较,联合治疗组治疗24小时时白细胞计数(WBC)、降钙素原(PCT)、C反应蛋白(CRP)明显降低[WBC(×10⁹/L):9.1±1.6比11.8±3.6,PCT(μg/L):14.5±2.4比22.7±3.2,CRP(mg/L):32.2±6.3比67.2±7.2,均P < 0.01],痰液排出量明显增加(mL:49.3±12.5比36.8±11.8,P < 0.01);治疗72小时时,联合治疗组氧合指数(PaO₂/FiO₂)明显升高[mmHg(1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa):278±28比238±39,P < 0.01],PEEP、FiO₂、气道阻力(Raw)明显降低[PEEP(cmH₂O):5±2比7±3,FiO₂:0.40±0.11比0.49±0.12,Raw(cmH₂O):12.8±(此处原文有误,推测为12.8±0.7)比16.2±0.8,均P < 0.01]。两组静态肺顺应性(Cst)或Pplat比较,差异无统计学意义。与单纯通气组比较,联合治疗组机械通气时间(天:5.5±3.0比8.6±2.1)、ICU住院时间(天:7.5±5.4比11.3±4.6)及人工气道拔除时间(天:6.6±2.8比9.4±3.3)明显缩短(均P < 0.01)。但单纯通气组与联合治疗组28天死亡率[4.1%(4/98)比3.1%(3/98)]、气管切开率[2.0%(2/98)比3.1%(3/98)]及Ⅰ - Ⅱ期皮肤压疮发生率[1.0%(1/98)比2.0%(2/98)]比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。两组均未出现人工气道脱落、气胸及Ⅲ - Ⅳ期压疮。

结论

与单纯侧卧位通气比较,侧卧位通气联合振动排痰治疗能更有效改善ARDS患者呼吸功能,减轻感染,缩短机械通气时间及ICU住院时间,促进患者恢复及康复。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验