Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;190:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
To compare the response of dry eye disease (DED) to treatment with topical steroid in patients with and without graft-vs-host disease (GVHD).
Post hoc analysis of a double-masked, randomized clinical trial.
This single-center study included 42 patients with moderate-to-severe DED associated with (n = 21) or without (n = 21) chronic GVHD. In each group, patients received either loteprednol etabonate 0.5% ophthalmic suspension or artificial tears twice daily for 4 weeks. Clinical data, including Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), conjunctival lissamine green staining, tear break-up time (TBUT), and Schirmer test, were evaluated before and after treatment.
There were no significant differences in signs and symptoms of DED between the groups at baseline. In non-GVHD patients receiving loteprednol treatment, the average OSDI score decreased by 34% from 49.5 ± 5.9 to 32.6 ± 4.8 (mean ± standard error of the mean, P = .001) and the average CFS score decreased by 41% from 5.6 ± 0.6 to 3.3 ± 0.9 (P = .02). On the other hand, loteprednol treatment in GVHD patients resulted in minimal change in OSDI (59.2 ± 6.7 to 61.1 ± 7.1, 3% increase, P = .66) and CFS (5.5 ± 0.5 to 5.3 ± 1.1, 4% decrease, P = .85) scores. Treatment with artificial tears resulted in 22% decrease of OSDI (P = .10) and 32% decrease of CFS (P = .02) scores in non-GVHD patients, and had minimal effect in patients with GVHD.
DED patients with ocular GVHD have a less favorable response to a low-dose topical steroid regimen compared with those without ocular GVHD even with similar baseline disease severity.
比较伴有和不伴有移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的干眼患者对局部皮质类固醇治疗的反应。
一项双盲、随机临床试验的事后分析。
这项单中心研究纳入了 42 例与慢性 GVHD 相关(n=21)或不相关(n=21)的中重度干眼患者。每组患者均接受妥布霉素地塞米松 0.5%混悬滴眼液或人工泪液,每日 2 次,持续 4 周。治疗前后评估临床数据,包括眼表疾病指数(OSDI)问卷、角膜荧光素染色(CFS)、结膜丽丝胺绿染色、泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)和泪液分泌试验。
在基线时,两组患者的干眼体征和症状无显著差异。在接受妥布霉素治疗的非 GVHD 患者中,OSDI 评分平均下降 34%,从 49.5±5.9 降至 32.6±4.8(均值±标准误,P=0.001),CFS 评分平均下降 41%,从 5.6±0.6 降至 3.3±0.9(P=0.02)。另一方面,GVHD 患者接受妥布霉素治疗后,OSDI(59.2±6.7 至 61.1±7.1,增加 3%,P=0.66)和 CFS(5.5±0.5 至 5.3±1.1,减少 4%,P=0.85)评分仅有微小变化。人工泪液治疗可使非 GVHD 患者的 OSDI 评分降低 22%(P=0.10),CFS 评分降低 32%(P=0.02),而 GVHD 患者则影响较小。
与不伴有眼部 GVHD 的患者相比,即使疾病严重程度相似,伴有眼部 GVHD 的干眼患者对低剂量局部皮质类固醇治疗方案的反应较差。