Yorgason Jeremy B, Draper Thomas W, Bronson Haley, Nielson Makayla, Babcock Kate, Jones Karolina, Hill Melanie S, Howard Myranda
1 Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
2 University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2018 Oct;87(3):225-243. doi: 10.1177/0091415018757211. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
Studies of longevity among centenarians examine biological, psychological, and social factors, yet few consider these components concurrently. This study explores such factors individually and collectively, as they are related to days lived past the age of 100 years. Data from 268 family members of centenarians identified in the State of Utah between 2008 and 2015 were used in negative binomial models predicting number of days lived among the centenarians. Findings suggested that sleep latency (biological), life satisfaction (psychological), and attachment closeness (social) were predictive factors of more days lived within individual models. When considered together, sleep latency and life satisfaction remained significant predictors of days lived. Although biological factors are commonly considered in relation to longevity, this study further indicates that psychological and social factors may play important roles in life expectancy. Further examination is needed to explore how these factors link additionally to active life expectancy.
对百岁老人长寿情况的研究考察了生物、心理和社会因素,但很少有研究同时考虑这些因素。本研究分别和综合探讨了这些因素,因为它们与100岁以后的存活天数有关。2008年至2015年间在犹他州确定的268名百岁老人家庭成员的数据被用于负二项式模型,以预测百岁老人的存活天数。研究结果表明,睡眠潜伏期(生物因素)、生活满意度(心理因素)和依恋亲密程度(社会因素)在各自的模型中是存活天数更多的预测因素。综合考虑时,睡眠潜伏期和生活满意度仍然是存活天数的显著预测因素。虽然通常认为生物因素与长寿有关,但本研究进一步表明,心理和社会因素可能在预期寿命中发挥重要作用。需要进一步研究来探讨这些因素如何与积极预期寿命进一步关联。