Lin Patrick S, Semrad Thomas J
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Gene Upshaw Memorial Tahoe Forest Cancer Center, Truckee, CA, USA.
Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1765:281-297. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7765-9_18.
Concurrent with an expansion in the number of agents available for the treatment of advanced CRC, there has been an increase in our understanding of selection biomarkers to optimize the management of patients with this disease. For CRC patients being considered for anti-EGFR therapy, expanded RAS testing is the standard of care to determine the subset of patients who can benefit from cetuximab or panitumumab in conjunction with chemotherapy. A small fraction of patients have HER2 amplification where emerging data suggest treatment with drugs targeting this alteration. Although advanced CRC patients who harbor the BRAF V600E mutation have a poorer prognosis, they are eligible for combinatorial therapy targeting EGFR/BRAF or BRAF/MEK within the MAP kinase signaling pathway. Once primarily thought to be a negative prognostic marker, BRAF V600E mutation is now considered as a positive predictive factor with an opportunity for clinical intervention. A growing body of evidence also supports MSI testing as clinical benefits with immune checkpoint blockade by cancer immunotherapy have been demonstrated in MSI-high patients whose tumors exhibit high mutational burden. It has been established that UGT1A1*28 polymorphism is associated with irinotecan toxicity, but this test is rarely performed as the management strategy has not been identified. No established predictive biomarker for anti-VEGF therapy has yet to be discovered.It is becoming increasingly apparent that our growing understanding of biomarkers is revolutionizing and improving our strategies in the treatment of advanced CRC. Traditional nonselective cytotoxic chemotherapy is gradually being augmented and even in some cases supplanted by selective targeted agents based on our increasing understanding of tumor signaling and mechanism at the molecular level. The prospect of personalized medicine in directing treatment approaches that are optimally beneficial for patients brings tremendous excitement to the growing field of cancer therapeutics. As discussed in this chapter, the concurrent development of molecular biomarkers with new treatment strategies holds great promise of precision medicine in improving outcomes for patients with advanced CRC.
随着可用于治疗晚期结直肠癌(CRC)的药物数量不断增加,我们对选择生物标志物的理解也有所加深,以便优化对这种疾病患者的管理。对于考虑接受抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)治疗的CRC患者,扩大RAS检测是确定哪些患者可从西妥昔单抗或帕尼单抗联合化疗中获益的标准治疗手段。一小部分患者存在人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)扩增,新出现的数据表明可使用针对这种改变的药物进行治疗。尽管携带BRAF V600E突变的晚期CRC患者预后较差,但他们有资格接受针对丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAP)信号通路中EGFR/BRAF或BRAF/MEK的联合治疗。BRAF V600E突变曾一度被认为是负面预后标志物,现在则被视为有临床干预机会的阳性预测因子。越来越多的证据也支持微卫星不稳定性(MSI)检测,因为在肿瘤具有高突变负荷的MSI高的患者中,癌症免疫疗法的免疫检查点阻断已显示出临床益处。已证实尿苷二磷酸葡萄糖醛酸基转移酶1A1(UGT1A1)*28多态性与伊立替康毒性相关,但由于尚未确定管理策略,这项检测很少进行。尚未发现用于抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗的既定预测生物标志物。越来越明显的是,我们对生物标志物的不断深入理解正在彻底改变并改进我们治疗晚期CRC的策略。基于我们对肿瘤分子水平信号传导和机制的日益了解,传统的非选择性细胞毒性化疗正逐渐得到补充,甚至在某些情况下被选择性靶向药物所取代。个性化医疗指导对患者最有益的治疗方法的前景,给不断发展的癌症治疗领域带来了巨大的兴奋。如本章所讨论的,分子生物标志物与新治疗策略的同步发展,在改善晚期CRC患者的治疗效果方面具有精准医疗的巨大潜力。