Schostak M, König F, Bögemann M, Goebell P, Hammerer P, Machtens S, Schwentner C, Thomas C, von Amsberg G, von Rundstedt F-C, Heidenreich A
Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Leipziger Straße 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
ATURO, Facharztzentrum für Urologie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Urologe A. 2018 Jul;57(7):813-820. doi: 10.1007/s00120-018-0680-9.
In March 2017 the 'Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference' (APCCC) took place in St. Gallen (Switzerland). The APCCC-panelists are internationally well known experts. With the actual data in mind they discussed treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer in order to update the international APCCC-recommendations from the previous meeting in 2015. Recently these consensus recommendations have been published in "European Urology".A group of German experts discussed this year APCCC-votes during the meeting and the recommendations that were concluded from the votes from the German perspective. Reasons for an additional German discussion are country-specific variations that may have influenced the APCCC-votes und recommendations. Due to the concept of the APCCC-meeting the wording of the questions could not always be as necessary.One focus of this year consensus discussion was the treatment of metastatic castration-naive prostate cancer (mCNPC). There are new data which may also influence the therapeutic situation of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Further points of discussion were the impact of new imaging procedures in the clinical setting as well as the treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer.
2017年3月,“晚期前列腺癌共识会议”(APCCC)在瑞士圣加仑召开。APCCC的专家小组成员均为国际知名专家。基于实际数据,他们讨论了晚期前列腺癌患者的治疗方案,以更新自2015年上次会议以来的国际APCCC推荐意见。最近,这些共识性推荐意见已发表在《欧洲泌尿外科杂志》上。一组德国专家在会议期间讨论了今年的APCCC投票情况以及从德国视角得出的投票建议。进行额外德国讨论的原因是可能影响APCCC投票和建议的特定国家差异。由于APCCC会议的概念,问题的措辞并非总是如所需那样。今年共识讨论的一个重点是转移性去势敏感性前列腺癌(mCNPC)的治疗。有新数据可能也会影响转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者的治疗情况。其他讨论要点包括新成像程序在临床环境中的影响以及寡转移前列腺癌的治疗。