Suppr超能文献

预防伤寒热的疫苗。

Vaccines for preventing typhoid fever.

作者信息

Milligan Rachael, Paul Mical, Richardson Marty, Neuberger Ami

机构信息

Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK, L3 5QA.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 31;5(5):CD001261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001261.pub4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Typhoid fever and paratyphoid fever continue to be important causes of illness and death, particularly among children and adolescents in south-central and southeast Asia. Two typhoid vaccines are widely available, Ty21a (oral) and Vi polysaccharide (parenteral). Newer typhoid conjugate vaccines are at varying stages of development and use. The World Health Organization has recently recommended a Vi tetanus toxoid (Vi-TT) conjugate vaccine, Typbar-TCV, as the preferred vaccine for all ages.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of vaccines for preventing typhoid fever.

SEARCH METHODS

In February 2018, we searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, and mRCT. We also searched the reference lists of all included trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing typhoid fever vaccines with other typhoid fever vaccines or with an inactive agent (placebo or vaccine for a different disease) in adults and children. Human challenge studies were not eligible.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently applied inclusion criteria and extracted data, and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We computed vaccine efficacy per year of follow-up and cumulative three-year efficacy, stratifying for vaccine type and dose. The outcome addressed was typhoid fever, defined as isolation of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi in blood. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) and efficacy (1 - RR as a percentage) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

In total, 18 RCTs contributed to the quantitative analysis in this review: 13 evaluated efficacy (Ty21a: 5 trials; Vi polysaccharide: 6 trials; Vi-rEPA: 1 trial; Vi-TT: 1 trial), and 9 reported on adverse events. All trials but one took place in typhoid-endemic countries. There was no information on vaccination in adults aged over 55 years of age, pregnant women, or travellers. Only one trial included data on children under two years of age.Ty21a vaccine (oral vaccine, three doses)A three-dose schedule of Ty21a vaccine probably prevents around half of typhoid cases during the first three years after vaccination (cumulative efficacy 2.5 to 3 years: 50%, 95% CI 35% to 61%, 4 trials, 235,239 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). These data include patients aged 3 to 44 years.Compared with placebo, this vaccine probably does not cause more vomiting, diarrhoea, nausea or abdominal pain (2 trials, 2066 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), headache, or rash (1 trial, 1190 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); however, fever (2 trials, 2066 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) is probably more common following vaccination.Vi polysaccharide vaccine (injection, one dose)A single dose of Vi polysaccharide vaccine prevents around two-thirds of typhoid cases in the first year after vaccination (year 1: 69%, 95% CI 63% to 74%; 3 trials, 99,979 participants; high-certainty evidence). In year 2, trial results were more variable, with the vaccine probably preventing between 45% and 69% of typhoid cases (year 2: 59%, 95% CI 45% to 69%; 4 trials, 194,969 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). These data included participants aged 2 to 55 years of age.The three-year cumulative efficacy of the vaccine may be around 55% (95% CI 30% to 70%; 11,384 participants, 1 trial; low-certainty evidence). These data came from a single trial conducted in South Africa in the 1980s in participants aged 5 to 15 years.Compared with placebo, this vaccine probably did not increase the incidence of fever (3 trials, 132,261 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or erythema (3 trials, 132,261 participants; low-certainty evidence); however, swelling (3 trials, 1767 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and pain at the injection site (1 trial, 667 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) were more common in the vaccine group.Vi-rEPA vaccine (two doses)Administration of two doses of the Vi-rEPA vaccine probably prevents between 50% and 96% of typhoid cases during the first two years after vaccination (year 1: 94%, 95% CI 75% to 99%; year 2: 87%, 95% CI 56% to 96%, 1 trial, 12,008 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). These data came from a single trial with children two to five years of age conducted in Vietnam.Compared with placebo, both the first and the second dose of this vaccine increased the risk of fever (1 trial, 12,008 and 11,091 participants, low-certainty evidence) and the second dose increase the incidence of swelling at the injection site (one trial, 11,091 participants, moderate-certainty evidence).Vi-TT vaccine (two doses)We are uncertain of the efficacy of administration of two doses of Vi-TT (PedaTyph) in typhoid cases in children during the first year after vaccination (year 1: 94%, 95% CI -1% to 100%, 1 trial, 1625 participants; very low-certainty evidence). These data come from a single cluster-randomized trial in children aged six months to 12 years and conducted in India. For single dose Vi-TT (Typbar-TCV), we found no efficacy trials evaluating the vaccine with natural exposure.There were no reported serious adverse effects in RCTs of any of the vaccines studied.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The licensed Ty21a and Vi polysaccharide vaccines are efficacious in adults and children older than two years in endemic countries. The Vi-rEPA vaccine is just as efficacious, although data is only available for children. The new Vi-TT vaccine (PedaTyph) requires further evaluation to determine if it provides protection against typhoid fever. At the time of writing, there were only efficacy data from a human challenge setting in adults on the Vi-TT vaccine (Tybar), which clearly justify the ongoing field trials to evaluate vaccine efficacy.

摘要

背景

伤寒和副伤寒仍然是重要的致病和致死原因,特别是在南亚和东南亚的儿童和青少年中。两种伤寒疫苗广泛可用,即Ty21a(口服)和Vi多糖(注射)。新型伤寒结合疫苗正处于不同的研发和使用阶段。世界卫生组织最近推荐了一种Vi破伤风类毒素(Vi-TT)结合疫苗Typbar-TCV,作为各年龄段的首选疫苗。

目的

评估疫苗预防伤寒的效果。

检索方法

2018年2月,我们检索了Cochrane传染病组专业注册库、CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、LILACS和mRCT。我们还检索了所有纳入试验的参考文献列表。

选择标准

比较伤寒疫苗与其他伤寒疫苗或与无活性制剂(安慰剂或用于其他疾病的疫苗)在成人和儿童中的随机和半随机对照试验(RCT)。人体激发试验不符合要求。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立应用纳入标准并提取数据,并使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。我们计算了每年随访的疫苗效力和三年累积效力,并按疫苗类型和剂量进行分层。所关注的结局是伤寒,定义为血液中分离出伤寒沙门氏菌。我们计算了风险比(RRs)和效力(1 - RR作为百分比)以及95%置信区间(CIs)。

主要结果

本综述共有18项RCT参与定量分析:13项评估效力(Ty21a:5项试验;Vi多糖:6项试验;Vi-rEPA:1项试验;Vi-TT:1项试验),9项报告了不良事件。除一项试验外,所有试验均在伤寒流行国家进行。没有关于55岁以上成年人、孕妇或旅行者接种疫苗的信息。只有一项试验纳入了2岁以下儿童的数据。

Ty21a疫苗(口服疫苗,三剂)

Ty21a疫苗的三剂接种方案可能在接种后的前三年预防约一半的伤寒病例(2.5至3年累积效力:50%,95%CI 35%至61%,4项试验,235,239名参与者,中等确定性证据)。这些数据包括3至44岁的患者。

与安慰剂相比,该疫苗可能不会导致更多的呕吐、腹泻、恶心或腹痛(2项试验,2066名参与者;中等确定性证据)、头痛或皮疹(1项试验,1190名参与者;中等确定性证据);然而,接种后发热(2项试验,2066名参与者;中等确定性证据)可能更常见。

Vi多糖疫苗(注射,一剂)

单剂量Vi多糖疫苗在接种后的第一年预防约三分之二的伤寒病例(第1年:69%,95%CI 63%至74%;3项试验,99,979名参与者;高确定性证据)。在第2年,试验结果的变异性更大,该疫苗可能预防45%至69%的伤寒病例(第2年:59%,95%CI 45%至69%;4项试验,194,969名参与者;中等确定性证据)。这些数据包括2至55岁的参与者。

该疫苗的三年累积效力可能约为55%(95%CI 30%至70%;11,384名参与者,1项试验;低确定性证据)。这些数据来自20世纪80年代在南非对5至15岁参与者进行的一项单一试验。

与安慰剂相比,该疫苗可能不会增加发热(3项试验,132,261名参与者;中等确定性证据)或红斑(3项试验,132,261名参与者;低确定性证据)的发生率;然而,肿胀(3项试验,1767名参与者;中等确定性证据)和注射部位疼痛(1项试验,667名参与者;中等确定性证据)在疫苗组中更常见。

Vi-rEPA疫苗(两剂)

接种两剂Vi-rEPA疫苗可能在接种后的前两年预防50%至96%的伤寒病例(第1年:94%,95%CI 75%至99%;第2年:87%,95%CI 56%至96%,1项试验,12,008名参与者;中等确定性证据)。这些数据来自越南对2至5岁儿童进行的一项单一试验。

与安慰剂相比,该疫苗的第一剂和第二剂均增加了发热风险(1项试验,12,008名和11,091名参与者,低确定性证据),第二剂增加了注射部位肿胀的发生率(1项试验,11,091名参与者,中等确定性证据)。

Vi-TT疫苗(两剂)

我们不确定接种两剂Vi-TT(PedaTyph)对儿童伤寒病例在接种后第一年的效力(第1年:94%,95%CI -1%至100%,1项试验,1625名参与者;极低确定性证据)。这些数据来自印度对6个月至12岁儿童进行的一项单一整群随机试验。对于单剂量Vi-TT(Typbar-TCV),我们未找到评估该疫苗自然暴露效力的试验。

在所研究的任何疫苗的RCT中均未报告严重不良反应。

作者结论

在流行国家,已获许可的Ty21a和Vi多糖疫苗对成人和2岁以上儿童有效。Vi-rEPA疫苗同样有效,尽管仅有儿童的数据。新型Vi-TT疫苗(PedaTyph)需要进一步评估以确定其是否能预防伤寒。在撰写本文时,Vi-TT疫苗(Tybar)仅有人体激发试验中的成人效力数据,这明确证明了正在进行的评估疫苗效力的现场试验的合理性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcf5/6494485/64125896ec60/nCD001261-AFig-FIG01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验