Davies Andrew Neil, Elsner Frank, Filbet Marilène Jeanne, Porta-Sales Josep, Ripamonti Carla, Santini Daniele, Webber Kath
Department of Supportive and Palliative Care, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.
Department of Palliative Medicine, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2018 Sep;8(3):241-249. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001467. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
Breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) is common and has a significant impact on the quality of life of patients with cancer. This review compares current national/international BTcP guidelines in order to identify disparities and priorities for further research.
Relevant guidelines were identified using searches of PubMed, the National Guideline Clearinghouse, the internet (commercial search engines), and correspondence with key opinion leaders and relevant pharmaceutical companies. Identified guidelines were compared, using the Association for Palliative Medicine of Great Britain and Ireland recommendations as the 'reference' guideline.
Ten specific BTcP guidelines were identified/reviewed, as well as major international generic cancer pain guidelines. In general, there was good agreement between the specific BTcP guidelines, although there remain some differences in terms of definition, diagnostic criteria and treatment of BTcP. Disparities between the different BTcP guidelines invariably reflect personal opinion rather than research evidence. Generic cancer pain guidelines continue to support the use of oral opioids as rescue medication, while specific BTcP guidelines invariably endorse the use of transmucosal opioids as rescue medication.
Current guidelines agree on many aspects of the management of BTcP. However, the evidence to support current guidelines remains low grade, and so more research is needed in this area of care. Moreover, there needs to be an international consensus on the definition and diagnosis criteria of BTcP.
突破性癌痛(BTcP)很常见,对癌症患者的生活质量有重大影响。本综述比较了当前国家/国际BTcP指南,以确定差异和进一步研究的重点。
通过检索PubMed、国家指南交换中心、互联网(商业搜索引擎)以及与关键意见领袖和相关制药公司通信来确定相关指南。使用英国和爱尔兰姑息医学协会的建议作为“参考”指南,对确定的指南进行比较。
确定/审查了十条具体的BTcP指南以及主要的国际通用癌症疼痛指南。总体而言,具体的BTcP指南之间存在良好的一致性,尽管在BTcP的定义、诊断标准和治疗方面仍存在一些差异。不同BTcP指南之间的差异总是反映个人观点而非研究证据。通用癌症疼痛指南继续支持使用口服阿片类药物作为解救药物,而具体的BTcP指南则始终认可使用经黏膜阿片类药物作为解救药物。
当前指南在BTcP管理的许多方面达成了一致。然而,支持当前指南的证据等级仍然较低,因此在这一护理领域需要更多研究。此外,需要就BTcP的定义和诊断标准达成国际共识。