Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Clinical Research Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Schizophr Bull. 2019 Apr 25;45(3):629-638. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby114.
Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) often feature social cognitive deficits. However, little work has focused on the factor structure of social cognition, and results have been inconsistent in schizophrenia. This study aimed to elucidate the factor structure of social cognition across people with SSDs and healthy controls. It was hypothesized that a 2-factor model, including lower-level "simulation" and higher-level "mentalizing" factors, would demonstrate the best fit across participants.
Participants with SSDs (N = 164) and healthy controls (N = 102) completed social cognitive tasks ranging from emotion recognition to complex mental state inference, as well as clinical and functional outcome, and neurocognitive measures. Structural equation modeling was used to test social cognitive models, models of social cognition and neurocognition, measurement invariance between cases and controls, and relationships with outcome measures.
A 2-factor (simulation and mentalizing) model fit the social cognitive data best across participants and showed adequate measurement invariance in both SSD and control groups. Patients showed lower simulation and mentalizing scores than controls, but only mentalizing was significantly associated with negative symptoms and functional outcome. Social cognition also mediated the relationship between neurocognition and both negative symptoms and functional outcome.
These results uniquely indicate that distinct lower- and higher-level aspects of social cognition exist across SSDs and healthy controls. Further, mentalizing may be particularly linked to negative symptoms and functional outcome. This informs future studies of the neural circuitry underlying social cognition and the development of targeted treatment options for improving functional outcome.
精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSDs)常伴有社会认知缺陷。然而,很少有工作关注社会认知的因素结构,并且在精神分裂症中的结果也不一致。本研究旨在阐明精神分裂症谱系障碍患者和健康对照组之间社会认知的因素结构。假设包括较低层次的“模拟”和较高层次的“心理化”因素的 2 因素模型将在参与者中表现出最佳拟合。
精神分裂症谱系障碍患者(N=164)和健康对照组(N=102)完成了从情绪识别到复杂心理状态推断等社会认知任务,以及临床和功能结果以及神经认知测量。结构方程模型用于测试社会认知模型、社会认知和神经认知模型、病例和对照组之间的测量不变性以及与结果测量的关系。
一个 2 因素(模拟和心理化)模型在参与者中最适合社会认知数据,并且在 SSD 和对照组中都显示出足够的测量不变性。患者的模拟和心理化得分低于对照组,但只有心理化与阴性症状和功能结果显著相关。社会认知也介导了神经认知与阴性症状和功能结果之间的关系。
这些结果独特地表明,精神分裂症谱系障碍和健康对照组之间存在不同的社会认知的较低和较高层次方面。此外,心理化可能与阴性症状和功能结果特别相关。这为未来研究社会认知的神经回路以及开发改善功能结果的针对性治疗方案提供了信息。