Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Cancer. 2018 Oct 15;124(20):4090-4097. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31560. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
For many childhood cancers, survival is lower among non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics in comparison with non-Hispanic whites, and this may be attributed to underlying socioeconomic factors. However, prior childhood cancer survival studies have not formally tested for mediation by socioeconomic status (SES). This study applied mediation methods to quantify the role of SES in racial/ethnic differences in childhood cancer survival.
This study used population-based cancer survival data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 database for black, white, and Hispanic children who had been diagnosed at the ages of 0 to 19 years in 2000-2011 (n = 31,866). Black-white and Hispanic-white mortality hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals, adjusted for age, sex, and stage at diagnosis, were estimated. The inverse odds weighting method was used to test for mediation by SES, which was measured with a validated census-tract composite index.
Whites had a significant survival advantage over blacks and Hispanics for several childhood cancers. SES significantly mediated the race/ethnicity-survival association for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, neuroblastoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma; SES reduced the original association between race/ethnicity and survival by 44%, 28%, 49%, and 34%, respectively, for blacks versus whites and by 31%, 73%, 48%, and 28%, respectively, for Hispanics versus whites ((log hazard ratio total effect - log hazard ratio direct effect)/log hazard ratio total effect).
SES significantly mediates racial/ethnic childhood cancer survival disparities for several cancers. However, the proportion of the total race/ethnicity-survival association explained by SES varies between black-white and Hispanic-white comparisons for some cancers, and this suggests that mediation by other factors differs across groups.
对于许多儿童癌症,与非西班牙裔白人和西班牙裔相比,非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔的存活率较低,这可能归因于潜在的社会经济因素。然而,先前的儿童癌症生存研究并未正式检验社会经济地位(SES)的中介作用。本研究应用中介方法来量化 SES 在儿童癌症生存的种族/族裔差异中的作用。
本研究使用了来自监测、流行病学和结果 18 数据库的基于人群的癌症生存数据,这些数据来自于 2000-2011 年诊断年龄在 0 至 19 岁的黑人、白人和西班牙裔儿童(n=31866)。调整年龄、性别和诊断时的分期后,估计了黑-白和西班牙裔-白死亡率风险比和 95%置信区间。采用逆概率加权法检验 SES 的中介作用,SES 用经过验证的普查区综合指数来衡量。
对于几种儿童癌症,白人的生存优势明显高于黑人西班牙裔。SES 显著中介了种族/族裔与生存的关联,包括急性淋巴细胞白血病、急性髓细胞白血病、神经母细胞瘤和非霍奇金淋巴瘤;SES 将黑人和白人之间的原始种族/族裔和生存关联分别降低了 44%、28%、49%和 34%,以及西班牙裔和白人之间的 31%、73%、48%和 28%((总效应对数危险比-直接效应对数危险比)/总效应对数危险比)。
SES 显著中介了几种癌症的种族/族裔儿童癌症生存差异。然而,SES 解释种族/族裔-生存关联的比例在某些癌症中在黑-白和西班牙裔-白比较之间有所不同,这表明不同群体的中介因素也不同。