Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Department of Critical Care Medicine, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Oct 25;56(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00712-18. Print 2018 Nov.
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry is becoming more popular and is replacing traditional identification methods in the clinical microbiology laboratory. We aimed to compare the Vitek mass spectrometry (MS) and Bruker Biotyper systems for the identification of isolated from clinical specimens and to report uncommon infections in humans. The microbial database from a hospital was searched for records between 2005 and 2016 to identify cultures that yielded Species identification by the Vitek MS and Bruker Biotyper systems was compared to identification by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Over the study period, 140 isolates were included. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing, 78 isolates were , 39 were , 12 were uncommon species (, , , , , and ), and the remaining 11 isolates were only identified at the genus level. The Vitek MS and Bruker Biotyper systems correctly identified 98.7% and 100% of isolates, respectively. While the Bruker Biotyper accurately identified 100% of isolates, the Vitek MS system correctly identified only 2.6% of isolates from this species. None of the uncommon species were successfully identified by either of these two systems. The overall accuracies of identification at the species level by the Vitek MS and Bruker Biotyper systems were 60.5% and 90.7%, respectively. An upgrade and correction of the Vitek MS and Bruker Biotyper databases is recommended to correctly identify species.
基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱分析正变得越来越流行,并在临床微生物学实验室中取代传统的鉴定方法。我们旨在比较 Vitek 质谱(MS)和 Bruker Biotyper 系统对从临床标本中分离出的 进行鉴定,并报告人类中不常见的 感染。在 2005 年至 2016 年期间,从医院的微生物数据库中搜索记录,以鉴定通过 Vitek MS 和 Bruker Biotyper 系统进行 种属鉴定的培养物。在研究期间,共纳入 140 株分离株。基于 16S rRNA 基因测序,78 株被鉴定为 ,39 株为 ,12 株为不常见的 种( 、 、 、 、 和 ),其余 11 株仅在属水平上被鉴定。Vitek MS 和 Bruker Biotyper 系统分别正确鉴定了 98.7%和 100%的 分离株。虽然 Bruker Biotyper 准确地鉴定了 100%的 分离株,但 Vitek MS 系统仅正确鉴定了该种的 2.6%的分离株。这两种系统均无法成功鉴定任何不常见的 种。Vitek MS 和 Bruker Biotyper 系统在种属水平上鉴定 的总体准确性分别为 60.5%和 90.7%。建议对 Vitek MS 和 Bruker Biotyper 数据库进行升级和修正,以正确鉴定 种。