Suppr超能文献

比较 Vitek MS 和 Bruker 基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱系统对临床标本中黄杆菌属的鉴定,并报告人类中罕见的黄杆菌属感染。

Comparison of the Vitek MS and Bruker Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry Systems for Identification of Chryseobacterium Isolates from Clinical Specimens and Report of Uncommon Chryseobacterium Infections in Humans.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Department of Critical Care Medicine, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Oct 25;56(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00712-18. Print 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry is becoming more popular and is replacing traditional identification methods in the clinical microbiology laboratory. We aimed to compare the Vitek mass spectrometry (MS) and Bruker Biotyper systems for the identification of isolated from clinical specimens and to report uncommon infections in humans. The microbial database from a hospital was searched for records between 2005 and 2016 to identify cultures that yielded Species identification by the Vitek MS and Bruker Biotyper systems was compared to identification by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Over the study period, 140 isolates were included. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing, 78 isolates were , 39 were , 12 were uncommon species (, , , , , and ), and the remaining 11 isolates were only identified at the genus level. The Vitek MS and Bruker Biotyper systems correctly identified 98.7% and 100% of isolates, respectively. While the Bruker Biotyper accurately identified 100% of isolates, the Vitek MS system correctly identified only 2.6% of isolates from this species. None of the uncommon species were successfully identified by either of these two systems. The overall accuracies of identification at the species level by the Vitek MS and Bruker Biotyper systems were 60.5% and 90.7%, respectively. An upgrade and correction of the Vitek MS and Bruker Biotyper databases is recommended to correctly identify species.

摘要

基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱分析正变得越来越流行,并在临床微生物学实验室中取代传统的鉴定方法。我们旨在比较 Vitek 质谱(MS)和 Bruker Biotyper 系统对从临床标本中分离出的 进行鉴定,并报告人类中不常见的 感染。在 2005 年至 2016 年期间,从医院的微生物数据库中搜索记录,以鉴定通过 Vitek MS 和 Bruker Biotyper 系统进行 种属鉴定的培养物。在研究期间,共纳入 140 株分离株。基于 16S rRNA 基因测序,78 株被鉴定为 ,39 株为 ,12 株为不常见的 种( 、 、 、 、 和 ),其余 11 株仅在属水平上被鉴定。Vitek MS 和 Bruker Biotyper 系统分别正确鉴定了 98.7%和 100%的 分离株。虽然 Bruker Biotyper 准确地鉴定了 100%的 分离株,但 Vitek MS 系统仅正确鉴定了该种的 2.6%的分离株。这两种系统均无法成功鉴定任何不常见的 种。Vitek MS 和 Bruker Biotyper 系统在种属水平上鉴定 的总体准确性分别为 60.5%和 90.7%。建议对 Vitek MS 和 Bruker Biotyper 数据库进行升级和修正,以正确鉴定 种。

相似文献

2
Identification, epidemiological relatedness, and biofilm formation of clinical Chryseobacterium indologenes isolates from central Taiwan.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2015 Oct;48(5):559-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 May 22.
7
Identification, characterization, and biofilm formation of clinical Chryseobacterium gleum isolates.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Jul;79(3):298-302. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.01.027. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
8
Comparison between Vitek MS, Bruker Biotyper, Vitek2, and API20E for differentiation of species of the genus Raoultella.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Mar;38(3):467-470. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-03444-4. Epub 2019 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and Epidemiological Features and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Species: A Scoping Review.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 30;61(7):1197. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071197.
2
Analysis of the efficacy of MALDI-TOF MS technology in identifying microorganisms in cancer patients and oncology hospital environment.
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 19;11(2):e42015. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42015. eCollection 2025 Jan 30.
3
Identification and Biosynthesis of Pro-Inflammatory Sulfonolipids from an Opportunistic Pathogen .
ACS Chem Biol. 2022 May 20;17(5):1197-1206. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.2c00141. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
5
Multiple Drug-Resistant CLABSI from an Extremely Rare Bacterium, .
Case Rep Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 11;2020:2097813. doi: 10.1155/2020/2097813. eCollection 2020.
6
Chryseobacterium arthrosphaerae ventriculitis: A case report.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 21;99(34):e21751. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021751.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges in the identification of and in cases of nosocomial infections and patients with cystic fibrosis.
New Microbes New Infect. 2017 Sep 13;20:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2017.09.002. eCollection 2017 Nov.
4
Use of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in the battle against bacterial infectious diseases: recent achievements and future perspectives.
Expert Rev Proteomics. 2017 Mar;14(3):253-267. doi: 10.1080/14789450.2017.1282825. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
6
Dental plaque bacteria with reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine are multidrug resistant.
BMC Microbiol. 2016 Sep 15;16:214. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0833-1.
8
Chryseobacterium artocarpi sp. nov., isolated from the rhizosphere soil of Artocarpus integer.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014 Sep;64(Pt 9):3153-3159. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.063594-0. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
9
Identification, characterization, and biofilm formation of clinical Chryseobacterium gleum isolates.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Jul;79(3):298-302. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.01.027. Epub 2014 Feb 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验