Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jan 30;57(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01163-18. Print 2019 Feb.
Limited methods for colistin MIC determination are available to clinical microbiology laboratories. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) test compared to that of broth microdilution (BMD) for identifying colistin MICs. CBDE was compared to colistin BMD using a collection of Gram-negative bacilli tested at two U.S. microbiology laboratories. The isolates tested included 121 retrospective clinical isolates, 45 prospective clinical isolates, and 6 -positive isolates. CBDE was performed with four 10-ml cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth tubes per isolate, to which 0, 1, 2, and 4 colistin 10-µg disks were added, generating final concentrations in the tubes of 0 (growth control), 1, 2, and 4 µg/ml, respectively. MICs were evaluated visually and interpreted using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints. Site 2 also compared CBDE to the reference broth macrodilution (BMAD) method ( = 110 isolates). Overall, CBDE yielded a categorical agreement (CA) and essential agreement (EA) of 98% and 99%, respectively, compared to the results of colistin BMD. Very major errors occurred for -producing strains, with MICs fluctuating from 2 to 4 µg/ml on repeat testing. The results for all other isolates were in CA with those of BMD. CBDE versus BMAD had an EA of 100% and a CA of 100%. Compared to currently used techniques, CBDE is an easy and practical method to perform colistin MIC testing. Some -producing isolates yielded MICs of 2 µg/ml by CBDE and 4 µg/ml by BMD. As such, the results for isolates with colistin MICs of 2 µg/ml by CBDE should be confirmed by the reference BMD method, and isolates with MICs of ≥2 µg/ml should be evaluated for the presence of genes.
临床微生物学实验室可用的粘菌素 MIC 测定方法有限。本研究旨在评估粘菌素肉汤稀释法(BMD)与粘菌素肉汤碟洗脱法(CBDE)测定粘菌素 MIC 的准确性。使用美国两个微生物学实验室测试的一组革兰氏阴性杆菌分离物比较 CBDE 与粘菌素 BMD。测试的分离物包括 121 例回顾性临床分离物、45 例前瞻性临床分离物和 6 例阳性分离物。对每个分离物进行 4 个 10ml 阳离子调整 Mueller-Hinton 肉汤管的 CBDE,向其中添加 0、1、2 和 4 个粘菌素 10μg 碟,分别在管中产生 0(生长对照)、1、2 和 4μg/ml 的终浓度。使用临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)折点进行 MIC 评估和解释。站点 2 还将 CBDE 与参考肉汤微量稀释法(BMAD)方法进行了比较(=110 株)。总体而言,与粘菌素 BMD 的结果相比,CBDE 的分类一致性(CA)和基本一致性(EA)分别为 98%和 99%。在重复测试时,产生的菌株 MIC 从 2 到 4μg/ml 波动,出现严重错误。所有其他分离物的结果均与 BMD 的 CA 一致。CBDE 与 BMAD 的 EA 为 100%,CA 为 100%。与目前使用的技术相比,CBDE 是一种简单实用的粘菌素 MIC 检测方法。一些产生的分离物通过 CBDE 产生 2μg/ml 的 MIC,而通过 BMD 产生 4μg/ml 的 MIC。因此,通过 CBDE 获得 2μg/ml 粘菌素 MIC 的分离物的结果应通过参考 BMD 方法确认,并且 MIC 为 ≥2μg/ml 的分离物应评估是否存在 基因。