Afacan Beral, Öztürk Veli Özgen, Geçgelen Cesur Mine, Köse Timur, Bostanci Nagihan
Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın.
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın.
Eur J Orthod. 2019 Mar 29;41(2):214-222. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy068.
To compare effect of two different orthodontic forces on maxillary canine distalization via evaluation of 30 analytes including cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) obtained from tension and compression sites.
Longitudinal, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial.
The upper right and left canines were randomly distalized by a continuous force of either 75 or 150 g, in 15 individuals with Class II division 1 malocclusion. GCF samples were obtained from the tension and the pressure sides of each canine at appliance placement (baseline) and after force application at 24 hours and 28 days without reactivation of the coil spring. The protein content of GCF was analysed by a multiplexed immunoassay. The effects of force, side, and time on the analyte levels were assessed by the Brunner-Langer method.
The changes of GCF analyte levels from baseline to 24 hours and 28 days.
Coin flipping was used for allocation of two forces.
The participants and periodontist who performed clinical measurements and GCF sampling were blinded to group assignment and interventions (double-blinded trial).
All patients completed the study. No harm was observed. When compared to baseline, both forces caused significant up-regulation of tumour necrosis factor-α and interleukin (IL)-1RA in the tension and the pressure sides at 28 days (P < 0.05), but not at 24 hours. Although GCF volume was similar between the two force groups over time (P > 0.05), IL-8 and MCP-1 levels in GCF were significantly lower at the pressure sites receiving higher force (150 g) at 24 hours (P < 0.05).
Although sample size (15 patients, 30 teeth) was adequate according to the initial power calculation, borderline significances may indicate lack of power or large variability among the samples.
Although a higher force of 150 g did not result in increased cumulative canine movement or GCF production, selective host mediators were differentially regulated by the magnitude and duration of the force.
The trial was registered retrospectively in the U.S. National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry. Full details of trial protocol NCT03555747 are available on request.
通过评估从张力和压力部位获取的龈沟液(GCF)中的30种分析物(包括细胞因子、生长因子和趋化因子),比较两种不同正畸力对上颌尖牙远中移动的影响。
纵向、双侧、随机对照试验。
在15例安氏II类1分类错牙合患者中,右上和左上尖牙分别通过75 g或150 g的持续力随机远中移动。在矫治器放置时(基线)以及施力后24小时和28天时,在不重新激活螺旋弹簧的情况下,从每颗尖牙的张力侧和压力侧获取GCF样本。通过多重免疫测定法分析GCF的蛋白质含量。采用Brunner-Langer方法评估力、侧别和时间对分析物水平的影响。
从基线到24小时和28天时GCF分析物水平的变化。
通过抛硬币分配两种力。
参与临床测量和GCF采样的受试者和牙周科医生对分组和干预措施不知情(双盲试验)。
所有患者均完成研究。未观察到不良影响。与基线相比,两种力在28天时均导致张力侧和压力侧肿瘤坏死因子-α和白细胞介素(IL)-1RA显著上调(P < 0.05),但在24小时时未出现这种情况。尽管随着时间推移,两个力组之间的GCF体积相似(P > 0.05),但在24小时时,接受较高力(150 g)的压力侧GCF中的IL-8和MCP-1水平显著较低(P < 0.05)。
尽管根据初始效能计算样本量(15例患者,30颗牙)足够,但临界显著性可能表明效能不足或样本间变异性大。
尽管150 g的较高力并未导致尖牙累积移动增加或GCF产生增加,但力的大小和持续时间对宿主选择性介质有不同的调节作用。
该试验在美国国立卫生研究院临床试验注册中心进行了回顾性注册。试验方案NCT03555747的详细信息可应要求提供。