Suppr超能文献

中国城乡医保整合下住院医疗净效益的不平等。

The inequality of inpatient care net benefit under integration of urban-rural medical insurance systems in China.

机构信息

School of Health Policy & Management, Nanjing Medical University, 101Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211166, People's Republic of China.

Creative Health Policy Research Group, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, China.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2018 Nov 22;17(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0891-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

China has recently made efforts to integrate urban and rural basic medical insurance systems in order to ensure both urban and rural enrollees obtain unified benefits. However, whether the distribution of government healthcare subsides has become more equitable remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze determinants of and inequality in net inpatient care benefits under the integration of urban-rural medical insurance systems in China.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a nationally representative household survey, the Fifth National Health Services Survey (2013), conducted in Anhui province. A multiple regression model and concentration index (CI) was used to estimate related factors and inequality of inpatient care net benefits.

RESULTS

Findings indicated that individuals received more inpatient care benefits when urban and rural social healthcare systems were integrated. Factors associated with net benefits included gender, age, marital status, retirement, educational level, history of chronic diseases, health status, willingness to seek inpatient care and per capita income. The rich were found to disproportionately benefit from inpatient care, and the CI of net benefits for integrated insurance enrollees was the lowest among all three available health insurance schemes. These findings indicate that the recent unification of urban-rural social health insurances reduces inequality in net benefits from government subsidies. Some socioeconomic factors, such as per capita income, 60 years of age and over, history of chronic disease and high educational level positively influence inequality.

CONCLUSION

In China, accelerating the integration of urban and rural medical insurance systems is an effective way to increase equity of benefit in urban and rural areas. Strategies aimed at reducing inpatient benefit inequality must address socioeconomic factors influencing healthcare outcomes.

摘要

背景

中国最近努力整合城乡基本医疗保险制度,以确保城乡参保人员获得统一的待遇。然而,政府医疗补贴的分配是否变得更加公平仍不得而知。本研究旨在分析中国城乡医疗保险制度整合后住院净受益的决定因素和不平等情况。

方法

数据来自于安徽省进行的全国代表性家庭调查,即第五次全国卫生服务调查(2013 年)。采用多元回归模型和集中指数(CI)来估计住院净受益的相关因素和不平等情况。

结果

研究结果表明,城乡社会医疗保险制度整合后,个人获得了更多的住院医疗受益。与净受益相关的因素包括性别、年龄、婚姻状况、退休、教育水平、慢性病史、健康状况、住院意愿和人均收入。发现富人在住院治疗中获得了不成比例的受益,而综合保险参保者的净受益集中指数在所有三种可用医疗保险方案中最低。这些发现表明,最近城乡社会医疗保险的统一减少了政府补贴净受益的不平等。一些社会经济因素,如人均收入、60 岁及以上、慢性病史和高教育水平,对不平等状况有积极影响。

结论

在中国,加快城乡医疗保险制度整合是增加城乡受益公平性的有效途径。旨在减少住院受益不平等的策略必须解决影响医疗结果的社会经济因素。

相似文献

1
4
Rural-urban disparities in the utilization of mental health inpatient services in China: the role of health insurance.
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2018 Dec;18(4):377-393. doi: 10.1007/s10754-018-9238-z. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
5
Can integration reduce inequity in healthcare utilization? Evidence and hurdles in China.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Sep 10;19(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4480-8.
7
The comparison of healthcare utilization inequity between URRBMI and NCMS in rural China.
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 14;18(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0987-1.

引用本文的文献

6
Does the integration of urban and rural health insurance influence the functional limitations of the middle-aged and elderly in rural China?
SSM Popul Health. 2023 May 25;23:101439. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101439. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
The impact of integrated urban and rural resident basic medical insurance on health service equity: Evidence from China.
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 13;11:1106166. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1106166. eCollection 2023.
9
10
Effect of Health Insurance Policy on the Health Outcomes of the Middle-Aged and Elderly: Progress Toward Universal Health Coverage.
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;10:889377. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.889377. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Health financing and integration of urban and rural residents' basic medical insurance systems in China.
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Nov 7;16(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0690-z.
3
Who benefits from the Obio Community Health Insurance Scheme in Rivers State, Nigeria? A benefit incidence analysis.
Int Health. 2016 Nov;8(6):405-412. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihw040. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
4
Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jun 5;16:195. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1441-3.
5
Benefit distribution of social health insurance: evidence from china's urban resident basic medical insurance.
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Sep;31(7):853-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv141. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
6
Who benefits from government healthcare subsidies? An assessment of the equity of healthcare benefits distribution in China.
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 17;10(3):e0119840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119840. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验