Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lancet. 2018 Nov 3;392(10158):1662-1671. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31777-X.
Total hip replacement is a frequently done and highly successful surgical intervention. The procedure is undertaken to relieve pain and improve function in individuals with advanced arthritis of the hip joint. Symptomatic osteoarthritis is the most common indication for surgery. In paper 1 of this Series, we focus on how patient factors should inform the surgical decision-making process. Substantial demands are placed upon modern implants, because patients expect to remain active for longer. We discuss the advances made in implant performance and the developments in perioperative practice that have reduced complications. Assessment of surgery outcomes should include patient-reported outcome measures and implant survival rates that are based on data from joint replacement registries. The high-profile failure of some widely used metal-on-metal prostheses has shown the shortcomings of the existing regulatory framework. We consider how proposed changes to the regulatory framework could influence safety.
全髋关节置换术是一种常见且非常成功的手术干预手段。该手术用于缓解髋关节关节炎晚期患者的疼痛并改善其功能。症状性骨关节炎是最常见的手术指征。在本系列的第 1 篇论文中,我们重点关注患者因素如何为手术决策过程提供信息。由于患者期望保持更长时间的活动能力,因此对现代植入物提出了很高的要求。我们讨论了在植入物性能方面的进步以及减少并发症的围手术期实践的发展。手术结果的评估应包括基于关节置换登记处数据的患者报告的结果测量和植入物存活率。一些广泛使用的金属对金属假体的高调失效暴露了现有监管框架的缺陷。我们考虑了拟议的监管框架变更如何影响安全性。