Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega (HURH), C/Dulzaina 2, 47012, Valladolid, Spain.
Research Unit. Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega (HURH), C/Dulzaina2, 47012, Valladolid, Spain.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2019 Oct;33(5):879-885. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0229-x. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
Epidural maintenance technique for labour analgesia updates constantly. Thanks to infusion pumps, the recently developed programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) may reduce the use of anesthetic drugs and minimize unintended consequences such as cardio or neurotoxicity. Nevertheless, it is not yet a general practice. So far, there are no comparative studies in the literature that address levobupivacaine-based CEI + PCEA versus CEI + PIEB + PCEA. A randomized double-blind trial was carried out to evaluate if PIEB could reduce local anesthetic use compare to PCEA. Primiparous pregnant patients were divided into two groups: PIEB group (continuous infusion plus intermittent automatic doses) and PCEA group (continuous infusion plus PCEA). The primary objective was to analyze the differences between both groups regarding levobupivacaine total dose. The secondary objectives were to find out the differences concerning pain control, motor blockage, satisfaction score, labour time and delivery outcomes. Statistical analyses were done by protocol. The study recruited 200 patients (103 PIEB, 97 PCEA). The total dose administered was significantly higher in PIEB group: PCEA group 52.97 mg, IC 95% 45.65-60.28 mg and PIEB group 62.04 mg, IC 95% 55.46-68.61 mg (p = 0.021). PIEB group required fewer top up boluses (median value1; range 0-2) than CEI + PCEA group (median value 6; range 3-9) p < 0.05. Satisfaction scores were higher in PIEB group (p = 0.039, CI 95% 1.23-1.42). CEI + PIEB was found to be a good alternative to CEI + PCEA with very high rates of satisfaction in both groups although it was higher in PIEB group. PIEB group required fewer PCEA boluses. Further studies are needed to determine the best approach for epidural pain management.Clinical Trial Number and Registry URL: NCT03133091 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03133091?term=MB+Rodriguez&rank=1) .
硬膜外分娩镇痛的维持技术不断更新。由于输注泵的出现,最近开发的程控间歇硬膜外推注(PIEB)可能会减少麻醉药物的使用,并最大限度地减少心脏或神经毒性等意外后果。然而,它尚未成为常规做法。迄今为止,文献中尚无比较左布比卡因基础连续硬膜外输注(CEI)+患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)与 CEI+PIEB+PCEA 的研究。一项随机双盲试验旨在评估 PIEB 是否可以减少局部麻醉药的使用,与 PCEA 相比。将初产妇分为两组:PIEB 组(连续输注加间歇自动剂量)和 PCEA 组(连续输注加 PCEA)。主要目的是分析两组之间在左布比卡因总剂量方面的差异。次要目标是找出疼痛控制、运动阻滞、满意度评分、分娩时间和分娩结果方面的差异。统计分析按方案进行。该研究招募了 200 名患者(PIEB 组 103 名,PCEA 组 97 名)。PIEB 组的给药总剂量明显较高:PCEA 组 52.97mg,IC95%45.65-60.28mg,PIEB 组 62.04mg,IC95%55.46-68.61mg(p=0.021)。PIEB 组需要较少的追加推注(中位数 1;范围 0-2)比 CEI+PCEA 组(中位数 6;范围 3-9)少,p<0.05。PIEB 组的满意度评分较高(p=0.039,CI95%1.23-1.42)。虽然 PIEB 组的满意度更高,但研究发现 CEI+PIEB 是 CEI+PCEA 的良好替代方案,两组的满意度均非常高。PIEB 组需要较少的 PCEA 推注。需要进一步研究以确定硬膜外疼痛管理的最佳方法。临床试验编号和注册网址:NCT03133091(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03133091?term=MB+Rodriguez&rank=1)。