Suppr超能文献

STEAM 研究:转移性结直肠癌患者中 FOLFOXIRI-Bev 序贯或同步治疗对比 FOLFOX-Bev 方案的 II 期随机临床试验

Phase II Randomized Trial of Sequential or Concurrent FOLFOXIRI-Bevacizumab Versus FOLFOX-Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (STEAM).

机构信息

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA

Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2019 Jul;24(7):921-932. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0344. Epub 2018 Dec 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

First-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) typically entails a biologic such as bevacizumab (BEV) with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan (FOLFIRI). STEAM (NCT01765582) assessed the efficacy of BEV plus FOLFOX/FOLFIRI (FOLFOXIRI), administered concurrently (cFOLFOXIRI-BEV) or sequentially (sFOLFOXIRI-BEV, FOLFOX-BEV alternating with FOLFIRI-BEV), versus FOLFOX-BEV for mCRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated mCRC ( = 280) were randomized 1:1:1 to cFOLFOXIRI-BEV, sFOLFOXIRI-BEV, or FOLFOX-BEV and treated with 4-6-month induction followed by maintenance. Coprimary objectives were overall response rate (ORR; first-line cFOLFOXIRI-BEV vs. FOLFOX-BEV) and progression-free survival (PFS; pooled first-line cFOLFOXIRI-BEV and sFOLFOXIRI-BEV vs. FOLFOX-BEV). Secondary/exploratory objectives included overall survival (OS), liver resection rates, biomarker analyses, and safety.

RESULTS

ORR was 72.0%, 72.8%, and 62.1% and median PFS was 11.9, 11.4, and 9.5 months with cFOLFOXIRI-BEV, sFOLFOXIRI-BEV, and FOLFOX-BEV, respectively. OS was similar between arms. ORR between cFOLFOXIRI-BEV and FOLFOX-BEV did not significantly differ ( = .132); thus, the primary ORR endpoint was not met. cFOLFOXIRI-BEV and sFOLFOXIRI-BEV numerically improved ORR and PFS, regardless of status. Median PFS was higher with pooled concurrent and sequential FOLFOXIRI-BEV versus FOLFOX-BEV (11.7 vs. 9.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.7; 90% confidence interval, 0.5-0.9; < .01). Liver resection rates were 17.2% (cFOLFOXIRI-BEV), 9.8% (sFOLFOXIRI-BEV), and 8.4% (FOLFOX-BEV). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in 91.2% (cFOLFOXIRI-BEV), 86.7% (sFOLFOXIRI-BEV), and 85.6% (FOLFOX-BEV) of patients, with no increase in serious chemotherapy-associated TEAEs.

CONCLUSION

cFOLFOXIRI-BEV and sFOLFOXIRI-BEV were well tolerated with numerically improved ORR, PFS, and liver resection rates versus FOLFOX-BEV, supporting triplet chemotherapy plus BEV as a first-line treatment option for mCRC IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The combination of first-line FOLFIRI with FOLFOX and bevacizumab (concurrent FOLFOXIRI-BEV) improves clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) relative to FOLFIRI-BEV or FOLFOX-BEV, but it is thought to be associated with increased toxicity. Alternating treatment of FOLFOX and FOLFIRI (sequential FOLFOXIRI-BEV) could improve tolerability. In the phase II STEAM trial, which is the largest study of FOLFOXIRI-BEV in patients in the U.S., it was found that both concurrent and sequential FOLFOXIRI-BEV are active and well tolerated in patients with previously untreated mCRC, supporting the use of these regimens as potential first-line treatment options for this population.

摘要

背景

转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的一线治疗通常需要使用生物制剂,如贝伐珠单抗(BEV)联合 5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙/奥沙利铂(FOLFOX)或 5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙/伊立替康(FOLFIRI)。STEAM(NCT01765582)评估了 BEV 联合 FOLFOX/FOLFIRI(FOLFOXIRI),包括同时给药(cFOLFOXIRI-BEV)或序贯给药(sFOLFOXIRI-BEV,FOLFOX-BEV 与 FOLFIRI-BEV 交替),与 FOLFOX-BEV 相比,在 mCRC 中的疗效。

方法

未接受过治疗的 mCRC 患者(=280)按 1:1:1 随机分为 cFOLFOXIRI-BEV、sFOLFOXIRI-BEV 和 FOLFOX-BEV 组,并接受 4-6 个月的诱导治疗,随后进行维持治疗。主要研究终点是总缓解率(ORR;一线 cFOLFOXIRI-BEV 与 FOLFOX-BEV)和无进展生存期(PFS;联合一线 cFOLFOXIRI-BEV 和 sFOLFOXIRI-BEV 与 FOLFOX-BEV)。次要/探索性终点包括总生存期(OS)、肝切除术率、生物标志物分析和安全性。

结果

cFOLFOXIRI-BEV、sFOLFOXIRI-BEV 和 FOLFOX-BEV 的 ORR 分别为 72.0%、72.8%和 62.1%,中位 PFS 分别为 11.9、11.4 和 9.5 个月。各组 OS 无显著差异。cFOLFOXIRI-BEV 与 FOLFOX-BEV 的 ORR 差异无统计学意义(=0.132);因此,主要 ORR 终点未达到。cFOLFOXIRI-BEV 和 sFOLFOXIRI-BEV 无论 状态如何,均能提高 ORR 和 PFS,且数值上有所改善。联合一线 cFOLFOXIRI-BEV 和 sFOLFOXIRI-BEV 的 PFS 高于 FOLFOX-BEV(11.7 与 9.5 个月;风险比,0.7;90%置信区间,0.5-0.9;<0.01)。肝切除术率分别为 17.2%(cFOLFOXIRI-BEV)、9.8%(sFOLFOXIRI-BEV)和 8.4%(FOLFOX-BEV)。91.2%(cFOLFOXIRI-BEV)、86.7%(sFOLFOXIRI-BEV)和 85.6%(FOLFOX-BEV)的患者发生≥3 级治疗相关不良事件(TEAEs),但无严重化疗相关 TEAEs 增加。

结论

cFOLFOXIRI-BEV 和 sFOLFOXIRI-BEV 耐受性良好,与 FOLFOX-BEV 相比,ORR、PFS 和肝切除术率均有提高,支持将三联化疗加 BEV 作为 mCRC 的一线治疗选择。

临床意义

与 FOLFIRI-BEV 或 FOLFOX-BEV 相比,FOLFIRI 联合 FOLFOX 和贝伐珠单抗(同时 FOLFOXIRI-BEV)一线治疗转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)可改善患者的临床结局,但认为其毒性增加。FOLFOX 和 FOLFIRI 交替治疗(序贯 FOLFOXIRI-BEV)可提高耐受性。在最大规模的 FOLFOXIRI-BEV 治疗美国 mCRC 患者的 II 期 STEAM 试验中,发现同时和序贯 FOLFOXIRI-BEV 对未接受治疗的 mCRC 患者均具有活性且耐受性良好,支持将这些方案作为该人群的潜在一线治疗选择。

相似文献

2
QUATTRO-II randomized trial: CAPOXIRI+bevacizumab vs. FOLFOXIRI+bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with mCRC.
Med. 2024 Sep 13;5(9):1164-1177.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2024.05.012. Epub 2024 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Alternating modified CAPOX/CAPIRI plus bevacizumab in untreated unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase 2 trial.
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024 Dec 11;9(1):346. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-02048-z.

本文引用的文献

3
Molecular Subtypes and Personalized Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2016;12:141-150. doi: 10.1007/s11888-016-0312-y. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
4
Integrated digital error suppression for improved detection of circulating tumor DNA.
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 May;34(5):547-555. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3520. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
7
Primary tumor location as a prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Feb 24;107(3). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju427. Print 2015 Mar.
9
Initial therapy with FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 23;371(17):1609-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403108.
10
An ultrasensitive method for quantitating circulating tumor DNA with broad patient coverage.
Nat Med. 2014 May;20(5):548-54. doi: 10.1038/nm.3519. Epub 2014 Apr 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验