Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2448-2460. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18472.
Harms and benefits of opioids for chronic noncancer pain remain unclear.
To systematically review randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of opioids for chronic noncancer pain.
The databases of CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, AMED, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to April 2018 for RCTs of opioids for chronic noncancer pain vs any nonopioid control.
Paired reviewers independently extracted data. The analyses used random-effects models and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to rate the quality of the evidence.
The primary outcomes were pain intensity (score range, 0-10 cm on a visual analog scale for pain; lower is better and the minimally important difference [MID] is 1 cm), physical functioning (score range, 0-100 points on the 36-item Short Form physical component score [SF-36 PCS]; higher is better and the MID is 5 points), and incidence of vomiting.
Ninety-six RCTs including 26 169 participants (61% female; median age, 58 years [interquartile range, 51-61 years]) were included. Of the included studies, there were 25 trials of neuropathic pain, 32 trials of nociceptive pain, 33 trials of central sensitization (pain present in the absence of tissue damage), and 6 trials of mixed types of pain. Compared with placebo, opioid use was associated with reduced pain (weighted mean difference [WMD], -0.69 cm [95% CI, -0.82 to -0.56 cm] on a 10-cm visual analog scale for pain; modeled risk difference for achieving the MID, 11.9% [95% CI, 9.7% to 14.1%]), improved physical functioning (WMD, 2.04 points [95% CI, 1.41 to 2.68 points] on the 100-point SF-36 PCS; modeled risk difference for achieving the MID, 8.5% [95% CI, 5.9% to 11.2%]), and increased vomiting (5.9% with opioids vs 2.3% with placebo for trials that excluded patients with adverse events during a run-in period). Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggested similar associations of opioids with improvements in pain and physical functioning compared with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (pain: WMD, -0.60 cm [95% CI, -1.54 to 0.34 cm]; physical functioning: WMD, -0.90 points [95% CI, -2.69 to 0.89 points]), tricyclic antidepressants (pain: WMD, -0.13 cm [95% CI, -0.99 to 0.74 cm]; physical functioning: WMD, -5.31 points [95% CI, -13.77 to 3.14 points]), and anticonvulsants (pain: WMD, -0.90 cm [95% CI, -1.65 to -0.14 cm]; physical functioning: WMD, 0.45 points [95% CI, -5.77 to 6.66 points]).
In this meta-analysis of RCTs of patients with chronic noncancer pain, evidence from high-quality studies showed that opioid use was associated with statistically significant but small improvements in pain and physical functioning, and increased risk of vomiting compared with placebo. Comparisons of opioids with nonopioid alternatives suggested that the benefit for pain and functioning may be similar, although the evidence was from studies of only low to moderate quality.
阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌症疼痛的危害和益处仍不清楚。
系统地回顾阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌症疼痛的随机临床试验(RCT)。
从 CENTRAL、CINAHL、EMBASE、MEDLINE、AMED 和 PsycINFO 数据库中检索了从开始到 2018 年 4 月的 RCT,比较了阿片类药物与任何非阿片类药物对照治疗慢性非癌症疼痛。
配对审查员独立提取数据。分析采用随机效应模型和 Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation 来评估证据的质量。
主要结果是疼痛强度(视觉模拟评分范围为 0-10cm,疼痛程度越低越好,最小重要差异 [MID] 为 1cm)、身体功能(36 项简明健康调查量表物理成分评分 [SF-36 PCS] 范围为 0-100 分,分数越高越好,MID 为 5 分)和呕吐的发生率。
纳入了 96 项 RCT,共包括 26169 名参与者(61%为女性;中位年龄为 58 岁[四分位间距,51-61 岁])。纳入的研究中,有 25 项试验为神经病理性疼痛,32 项试验为伤害性疼痛,33 项试验为中枢敏化(疼痛存在于组织损伤不存在的情况下),6 项试验为混合类型疼痛。与安慰剂相比,阿片类药物的使用与疼痛减轻相关(疼痛视觉模拟评分的加权均数差异 [WMD],-0.69cm[95%置信区间,-0.82 至-0.56cm];达到 MID 的模型风险差异,11.9%[95%置信区间,9.7%至 14.1%]),身体功能改善(SF-36 PCS 的 WMD,2.04 分[95%置信区间,1.41 至 2.68 分];达到 MID 的模型风险差异,8.5%[95%置信区间,5.9%至 11.2%]),以及呕吐增加(阿片类药物组为 5.9%,安慰剂组为 2.3%,排除了在预试验期出现不良反应的患者)。低至中等质量的证据表明,阿片类药物与非甾体抗炎药(疼痛:WMD,-0.60cm[95%置信区间,-1.54 至 0.34cm];身体功能:WMD,-0.90 分[95%置信区间,-2.69 至 0.89 分])、三环类抗抑郁药(疼痛:WMD,-0.13cm[95%置信区间,-0.99 至 0.74cm];身体功能:WMD,-5.31 分[95%置信区间,-13.77 至 3.14 分])和抗惊厥药(疼痛:WMD,-0.90cm[95%置信区间,-1.65 至-0.14cm];身体功能:WMD,0.45 分[95%置信区间,-5.77 至 6.66 分])相比,疼痛和身体功能有统计学意义但较小的改善,呕吐的风险增加。与非阿片类药物替代品相比,阿片类药物的比较表明,疼痛和功能的益处可能相似,尽管这些证据来自质量仅为低到中等的研究。