Suppr超能文献

静脉注射与口服对乙酰氨基酚用于剖宫产术后镇痛:一项随机试验。

Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial.

机构信息

Departments of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine.

Public Health Sciences.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2019 Aug 1;20(8):1584-1591. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny253.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Examination of postoperative analgesia with intravenous and oral acetaminophen.

DESIGN

Prospective, three-arm, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

A single academic medical center.

SUBJECTS

Parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery.

METHODS

This trial randomized 141 parturients to receive intravenous acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), oral acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), or no acetaminophen. All patients received a standardized neuraxial anesthetic with intrathecal opioids and scheduled postoperative ketorolac. The primary outcome, 24-hour opioid consumption, was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallace test and Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple comparisons. Secondary outcomes included 48-hour opioid consumption, first opioid rescue, pain scores, patient satisfaction, times to ambulation and discharge, and side effects.

RESULTS

Over 18 months, 141 parturients with similar demographic variables completed the study. Median (interquartile range) opioid consumption in intravenous morphine milligram equivalents at 24 hours was 0 (5), 0 (7), and 5 (7) for the intravenous, oral, and no groups, respectively, and differed between groups (global P = 0.017). Opioid consumption and other secondary outcomes did not differ between the intravenous vs oral or oral vs no groups. Opioid consumption was reduced at 24 hours with intravenous vs no acetaminophen (P = 0.015). Patients receiving no acetaminophen had 5.8 times the odds of consuming opioids (P = 0.036), consumed 40% more opioids controlling for time (P = 0.041), and had higher pain scores with ambulation (P = 0.004) compared with the intravenous group.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous acetaminophen did not reduce 24-hour opioid consumption or other outcomes compared with oral acetaminophen. Intravenous acetaminophen did decrease opioid consumption and pain scores compared with no acetaminophen.

摘要

目的

考察静脉注射和口服对乙酰氨基酚的术后镇痛效果。

设计

前瞻性、三臂、非盲、随机临床试验。

地点

一家学术医学中心。

对象

择期行剖宫产术的产妇。

方法

本试验将 141 名产妇随机分为三组,分别接受静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚(每 8 小时 1g,共 3 剂)、口服对乙酰氨基酚(每 8 小时 1g,共 3 剂)或不使用对乙酰氨基酚。所有患者均接受标准化的椎管内麻醉,辅以鞘内阿片类药物,并计划术后使用酮咯酸。主要结局指标为 24 小时内阿片类药物的消耗量,采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 Tukey-Kramer 多重比较调整进行评估。次要结局指标包括 48 小时内阿片类药物的消耗量、首次阿片类药物解救、疼痛评分、患者满意度、下床和出院时间以及副作用。

结果

在 18 个月的时间里,141 名具有相似人口统计学变量的产妇完成了研究。静脉注射吗啡毫克当量在 24 小时的中位数(四分位距)分别为 0(5)、0(7)和 5(7),分别为静脉组、口服组和无组,组间差异有统计学意义(全局 P=0.017)。静脉与口服或口服与无组之间的阿片类药物消耗和其他次要结局无差异。与无组相比,静脉组在 24 小时内阿片类药物消耗减少(P=0.015)。与静脉组相比,无组患者使用阿片类药物的可能性增加了 5.8 倍(P=0.036),控制时间后使用的阿片类药物增加了 40%(P=0.041),且在活动时疼痛评分更高(P=0.004)。

结论

与口服对乙酰氨基酚相比,静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚并未减少 24 小时阿片类药物的消耗或其他结局。与无组相比,静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚可减少阿片类药物消耗和疼痛评分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验