Center for Tobacco Products (CTP), Food and Drug Administration, Office of Science, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Building 71, Room G335, Silver Spring, MD, 20993-0002, USA.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Apr;6(2):356-363. doi: 10.1007/s40615-018-00532-1. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
Tobacco studies often combine data for Asian American and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander (AANHOPI) subgroups, masking subgroup differences. This study describes tobacco use (ever use and past 30-day use) among some disaggregated AANHOPI subgroups.
Data are from Wave 1 of the 2013-2014 Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, a nationally representative, longitudinal cohort study of civilian non-institutionalized adults and youth in the USA. The dataset contains a sample of 32,320 adults, of which 1623 identified as being of AANHOPI origin. Asian Americans further identified as being Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, or other Asian. Those who identified as Native Hawaiian, Guamanian or Chamarro, Samoan, and Other Pacific Islander were combined into an NHOPI group. Tobacco measures included ever and past 30-day use of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, cigars (traditional cigar, cigarillos, filtered cigar), hookah, and smokeless tobacco including snus pouches, and pipe tobacco. Unadjusted and adjusted estimates for tobacco use are reported by AANHOPI membership and sex.
In general, Asian Indians and Chinese had the lowest and NHOPI had the highest tobacco use prevalence compared to other AANHOPI subgroups. Males generally had higher prevalence compared to females. Prevalence varied by AANHOPI membership and tobacco product. Adjusted prevalence estimates were higher compared to unadjusted estimates for many subgroups, attenuating some unadjusted differences found between AANHOPI subgroups.
Tobacco use varies by AANHOPI subgroup and product type. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses can be conducted as tobacco use differences in AANHOPI subgroups may be attributed to socio-economic status differences. Treating these distinct subgroups as a monolithic group may contribute to reliance on tobacco prevention and control strategies that may have limited impact on specific subgroups.
烟草研究通常将亚裔美国人和夏威夷原住民及其他太平洋岛民(AANHOPI)的亚组数据合并,掩盖了亚组之间的差异。本研究描述了一些离散的 AANHOPI 亚组的烟草使用情况(曾经使用和过去 30 天使用)。
数据来自于 2013-2014 年人口烟草与健康评估(PATH)研究的第一波,这是一项针对美国平民非机构化成年人和青少年的全国代表性、纵向队列研究。该数据集包含 32320 名成年人的样本,其中 1623 人被确定为 AANHOPI 血统。亚裔美国人进一步分为印度裔、华裔、菲律宾裔、日裔、韩裔、越裔或其他亚裔。那些被确定为夏威夷原住民、关岛或查莫罗人、萨摩亚人和其他太平洋岛民的人被归入 NHOPI 群体。烟草测量包括曾经和过去 30 天使用香烟、电子烟、雪茄(传统雪茄、小雪茄、过滤雪茄)、水烟和无烟烟草,包括鼻烟袋和烟斗烟草。按 AANHOPI 成员身份和性别报告未调整和调整后的烟草使用估计数。
总体而言,与其他 AANHOPI 亚组相比,印度裔和华裔的烟草使用率最低,NHOPI 最高。男性的流行率普遍高于女性。流行率因 AANHOPI 成员身份和烟草产品而异。与许多亚组相比,调整后的流行率估计值高于未调整的估计值,这削弱了在 AANHOPI 亚组之间发现的一些未调整差异。
烟草使用因 AANHOPI 亚组和产品类型而异。可以进行未调整和调整后的分析,因为 AANHOPI 亚组中的烟草使用差异可能归因于社会经济地位的差异。将这些不同的亚组视为一个整体可能会导致依赖于可能对特定亚组影响有限的烟草预防和控制策略。