Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of general practice and elderly care medicine, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of general practice and elderly care medicine, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, the Netherlands.
J Psychosom Res. 2019 Feb;117:32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.12.010. Epub 2018 Dec 25.
Central sensitization (CS), a mechanism explaining the persistence of symptoms, has been the focus of many research projects. Explanations given to patients with chronic pain are often based on this mechanism. It is hypothesized that CS also plays an important role in the persistence of medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). However, definitions and operationalizations of CS vary. We conducted a systematic review of definitions, operationalizations and measurement instruments of CS.
We searched in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cinahl and The Cochrane Library till September 2017 and included papers that addressed CS in relation to chronic pain and/or MUS. Two reviewers independently selected, analysed and classified information from the selected publications. We performed a thematic analysis of definitions and operationalizations. We listed the measurement instruments.
We included 126 publications, 79 publications concerned chronic pain, 47 publications concerned MUS. Definitions of CS consistently encompass the theme hyperexcitability of the central nervous system (CNS). Additional themes are variably present: CNS locations, nature of sensory input, reduced inhibition and activation and modulation of the NDMA receptor. Hyperalgesia and allodynia are widely mentioned as operationalizations of CS. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) and (f)MRI are the most reported measurement instruments.
There is consensus that hyperexcitability is the central mechanism of CS. Operationalizations are based on this mechanism and additional components. There are many measurement instruments available, whose clinical value has still to be determined. There were no systematic differences in definitions and operationalizations between the publications addressing MUS and those addressing chronic pain.
中枢敏化(CS)是一种解释症状持续存在的机制,已成为许多研究项目的重点。对慢性疼痛患者的解释通常基于这一机制。据推测,CS 也在不明原因的医学症状(MUS)持续存在中起着重要作用。然而,CS 的定义和操作化方法各不相同。我们对 CS 的定义、操作化和测量工具进行了系统回顾。
我们在 PubMed、EMBASE、PsycINFO、Cinahl 和 The Cochrane Library 中进行了检索,检索时间截至 2017 年 9 月,纳入了与慢性疼痛和/或 MUS 有关的 CS 的研究。两名评审员独立选择、分析和分类所选出版物中的信息。我们对定义和操作化进行了主题分析。列出了测量工具。
我们纳入了 126 篇文献,79 篇涉及慢性疼痛,47 篇涉及 MUS。CS 的定义始终包含中枢神经系统(CNS)过度兴奋的主题。其他主题则不同程度地存在:CNS 位置、感觉输入的性质、抑制和激活减少以及 NMDA 受体的调制。痛觉过敏和感觉异常广泛被认为是 CS 的操作化。定量感觉测试(QST)和(f)MRI 是最常报道的测量工具。
普遍认为过度兴奋是 CS 的核心机制。操作化基于这一机制和其他组成部分。有许多测量工具可用,但它们的临床价值仍有待确定。针对 MUS 和慢性疼痛的研究在定义和操作化方面没有系统差异。