Suppr超能文献

西班牙疼痛科医师对爆发性癌痛的管理现状。

Current management of breakthrough cancer pain according to physicians from pain units in Spain.

机构信息

Pain Unit, Consorcio Hospital Provincial de Castellón, Castellón, Spain.

Pain Unit, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Transl Oncol. 2019 Sep;21(9):1168-1176. doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02044-8. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Current evidence suggests the need to improve the management of breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP). For this reason, we aimed to assess the opinion of a panel of experts composed exclusively of physicians from pain units, who play a major role in BTcP diagnosis and treatment, regarding the key aspects of BTcP management.

METHODS

An ad hoc questionnaire was developed to collect real-world data on the management of BTcP. The questionnaire had 5 parts: (a) organizational aspects of pain units (n = 12), (b) definition and diagnosis (n = 3), (c) screening (n = 3), (d) treatment (n = 8), and (e) follow-up (n = 7).

RESULTS

A total of 89 pain-unit physicians from 13 different Spanish regions were polled. Most of them agreed on the traditional definition of BTcP (78.9%) and the key features of BTcP (92.1%). However, only 30.3% of participants used the Davies' algorithm for BTcP diagnosis. Respondents preferred to prescribe rapid-onset opioids [mean 77.0% (SD 26.7%)], and most recommended transmucosal fentanyl formulations as the first option for BTcP. There was also considerable agreement (77.5%) on the need for early follow-up (48-72 h) after treatment initiation. Finally, 65.2% of participants believed that more than 10% of their patients underused rapid-onset opioids.

CONCLUSIONS

There was broad agreement among pain experts on many important areas of BTcP management, except for the diagnostic method. Pain-unit physicians suggest that rapid-onset opioids may be underused by BTcP patients in Spain, an important issue that need to be evaluated in future studies.

摘要

目的

目前的证据表明需要改进突破性癌痛(BTcP)的管理。因此,我们旨在评估一个由专门来自疼痛科的医生组成的专家组的意见,这些医生在 BTcP 的诊断和治疗中发挥着重要作用,评估 BTcP 管理的关键方面。

方法

专门开发了一份调查问卷,以收集关于 BTcP 管理的真实世界数据。问卷分为 5 个部分:(a)疼痛科的组织方面(n=12),(b)定义和诊断(n=3),(c)筛查(n=3),(d)治疗(n=8)和(e)随访(n=7)。

结果

共有来自西班牙 13 个不同地区的 89 名疼痛科医生接受了调查。他们大多数人同意 BTcP 的传统定义(78.9%)和 BTcP 的关键特征(92.1%)。然而,只有 30.3%的参与者使用 Davies 的 BTcP 诊断算法。受访者更倾向于开快速起效的阿片类药物[平均 77.0%(SD 26.7%)],大多数人建议将经黏膜芬太尼制剂作为 BTcP 的首选药物。在治疗开始后 48-72 小时进行早期随访的必要性也得到了广泛的认同(77.5%)。最后,65.2%的参与者认为超过 10%的 BTcP 患者未充分使用快速起效的阿片类药物。

结论

在 BTcP 管理的许多重要领域,疼痛专家之间存在广泛的共识,除了诊断方法。疼痛科医生认为,西班牙的 BTcP 患者可能未充分使用快速起效的阿片类药物,这是一个需要在未来研究中评估的重要问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验