Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Mar 16;22(3):371-380. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz047.
Text-messaging programs for smoking cessation, while efficacious, have high dropout rates. To address this problem, we developed and tested the feasibility and early efficacy of a peer-mentoring intervention for smoking cessation provided by former smokers.
Adult US smokers were recruited nationally into a randomized pilot trial (N = 200), comparing 6-8 weeks of automated text-messaging support (SmokefreeTXT) and automated text support plus personalized texts from a peer mentor who formerly smoked. The primary outcome was biochemically verified 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at 3 months post-quit date, assessed on an intention-to-treat basis (missing = smoking). Self-reported abstinence, program acceptability, user engagement, and user perceptions were also assessed.
Biochemically verified abstinence at 3 months was 7.9% (8/101) in the intervention group and 3.0% (3/99) in the control group (adjusted difference 6.5, 95% CI = 0.7% to 12.3%; p = .03). Self-reported abstinence at 3 months was 23.8% (24/101) in the intervention group versus 13.1% (13/99) in the control group (adjusted difference 12.7, 95% CI = 1.2% to 24.1%; p = .03). The intervention had a positive but insignificant effect on overall satisfaction (78.3% vs. 72.9% control group, p = .55). Having a mentor did not significantly alter duration of interaction with the program nor the proportion unsubscribing, although the intervention group reset their quit date with greater frequency (p < .01) and sent more messages (p < .01).
Peer mentoring combined with automated text messages was feasible and acceptable and increased smoking abstinence compared with automated messages alone. The results highlight the promise of this intervention approach and the need for a full-scale evaluation.
Providing quitting assistance by automated text messaging has been shown to increase smoking abstinence. Yet, dropout rates in text-messaging programs are high. No studies have tested the effectiveness of peer mentors who are former smokers as part of a text-messaging intervention, although they represent a promising way to retain, engage, and support smokers. This randomized pilot trial suggests that peer mentors can complement automated text-messaging programs to promote smoking abstinence.
虽然短信戒烟程序有效,但它们的辍学率很高。为了解决这个问题,我们开发并测试了一种由前吸烟者提供的戒烟朋辈辅导干预措施的可行性和早期效果。
全美成年吸烟者参与了一项随机试点试验(N=200),比较了 6-8 周的自动短信支持(SmokefreeTXT)和自动短信支持加上来自以前吸烟的朋辈导师的个性化短信。主要结局是在戒烟日期后 3 个月通过生物化学验证的 7 天点前戒烟率,采用意向治疗(缺失=吸烟)进行评估。还评估了自我报告的戒烟、计划的可接受性、用户参与度和用户感知。
在干预组中,3 个月时通过生物化学验证的戒烟率为 7.9%(8/101),而在对照组中为 3.0%(3/99)(调整差异 6.5,95%CI=0.7%至 12.3%;p=0.03)。在干预组中,3 个月时自我报告的戒烟率为 23.8%(24/101),而在对照组中为 13.1%(13/99)(调整差异 12.7,95%CI=1.2%至 24.1%;p=0.03)。该干预措施对整体满意度产生了积极但无统计学意义的影响(干预组为 78.3%,对照组为 72.9%,p=0.55)。虽然干预组更频繁地重置戒烟日期(p<.01)并发送更多消息(p<.01),但有导师并没有显著改变与计划的互动时间或取消订阅的比例。
与单独使用自动短信相比,朋辈辅导与自动短信相结合是可行的,并且可以提高戒烟率。结果突出了这种干预方法的前景,需要进行全面评估。
通过自动短信提供戒烟帮助已被证明可以增加戒烟率。然而,短信计划的辍学率很高。虽然朋辈导师作为短信干预的一部分代表了留住、吸引和支持吸烟者的一种有前途的方式,但尚无研究测试前吸烟者作为朋辈导师的有效性。这项随机试点试验表明,朋辈导师可以补充自动短信计划,以促进戒烟。