Suppr超能文献

美国邻里公园使用与两年内的身体活动:国家邻里公园研究。

United States' neighborhood park use and physical activity over two years: The National Study of Neighborhood Parks.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, 123 W Franklin Street, Building C, Suite 410, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, United States.

RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90407, United States.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2019 Jun;123:117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.027. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

Abstract

The United States lacks surveillance to monitor park use and conditions. The purpose of this study was to use the System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC) as a surveillance tool to describe the conditions, user characteristics, and physical activity of a national sample of neighborhood parks at two time points. Using a stratified multistage sampling strategy, a representative sample of 174 neighborhood parks in 25 major United States' cities were selected. During 2014 and 2016, park-related use, conditions, and physical activity were assessed using SOPARC in 169 parks. Overall, 74,106 park users were observed at baseline and 69,150 park users were observed two years later (p = 0.37). There were persistent disparities in park use by gender and age, with disproportionately more male than female users in each age group (child, teenager, adult, older adult). Older adults used the park less than other age groups. Almost two-thirds of park users were observed being sedentary (61.9% in 2014, 60.7% in 2016), followed by moderate (30.8%, 32.0%) and vigorous (7.3%, 7.3%) activity. Empty target areas increased over two years (75.3%, 77.6%; p = 0.01) and those that were equipped (2.6%, 1.2%; p = 0.0003), accessible (95.4%, 94.3%; p = 0.01), and organized (2.6%, 1.7%; p = 0.01) decreased. Areas that were usable (97.5%, 97.4%) or provided supervised activities (2.0%, 2.4%) did not change significantly. The findings demonstrate the value of SOPARC as a surveillance tool, identify user groups under represented at parks, and suggest an opportunity to encourage more park-based physical activity among park visitors.

摘要

美国缺乏监测手段来监测公园的使用和状况。本研究旨在使用社区体育活动观察系统(SOPARC)作为监测工具,描述全国范围内社区公园在两个时间点的使用情况、条件、用户特征和身体活动。采用分层多阶段抽样策略,从美国 25 个主要城市中选择了 174 个具有代表性的社区公园。在 2014 年和 2016 年,使用 SOPARC 在 169 个公园中评估了与公园相关的使用、状况和身体活动。总体而言,在基线时有 74106 名公园使用者被观察到,两年后有 69150 名公园使用者被观察到(p=0.37)。公园使用者存在性别和年龄的持久差异,每个年龄组(儿童、青少年、成年人、老年人)中男性使用者的比例都高于女性。老年人使用公园的频率低于其他年龄组。将近三分之二的公园使用者被观察到处于久坐状态(2014 年为 61.9%,2016 年为 60.7%),其次是中等(30.8%,32.0%)和剧烈(7.3%,7.3%)活动。空闲目标区域在两年内增加(75.3%,77.6%;p=0.01),配备(2.6%,1.2%;p=0.0003)、可进入(95.4%,94.3%;p=0.01)和组织(2.6%,1.7%;p=0.01)的区域减少。可用区域(97.5%,97.4%)或提供监督活动的区域(2.0%,2.4%)没有显著变化。研究结果表明,SOPARC 是一种有价值的监测工具,可以识别在公园中代表性不足的用户群体,并为鼓励公园游客更多地进行基于公园的身体活动提供机会。

相似文献

1
United States' neighborhood park use and physical activity over two years: The National Study of Neighborhood Parks.
Prev Med. 2019 Jun;123:117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.027. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
3
Public Parks in Hong Kong: Characteristics of Physical Activity Areas and Their Users.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jun 28;13(7):639. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13070639.
5
How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 4;15:610. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1960-6.
8
The First National Study of Neighborhood Parks: Implications for Physical Activity.
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.021. Epub 2016 May 18.
9
Active Use of Parks in Flanders (Belgium): An Exploratory Observational Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Dec 30;14(1):35. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14010035.
10
Contributions of Neighborhood Parks to Physical Activity in High-Poverty Urban Neighborhoods.
J Urban Health. 2018 Dec;95(6):881-887. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-0320-0.

引用本文的文献

3
Physical Activity in Natural Settings: An Opportunity for Lifestyle Medicine.
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024 May 11;19(1):73-87. doi: 10.1177/15598276241253211. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Reexamine the value of urban pocket parks under the impact of the COVID-19.
Urban For Urban Green. 2021 Sep;64:127294. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127294. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
6
What do adults want in parks? A qualitative study using walk-along interviews.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;22(1):753. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13064-5.
8
Exploring Children's Views on Important Park Features: A Qualitative Study Using Walk-Along Interviews.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 27;17(13):4625. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134625.
9
Placement of Outdoor Exercise Equipment and Physical Activity: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Two Parks in Southern California.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 10;17(7):2605. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072605.
10
An Observational Study of Park Attributes and Physical Activity in Neighborhood Parks of Shanghai, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 20;17(6):2080. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062080.

本文引用的文献

2
System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): Reliability and Feasibility Measures.
J Phys Act Health. 2006 Feb;3(s1):S208-S222. doi: 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s208.
3
Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health - A systematic review of reviews.
Environ Res. 2017 Oct;158:373-384. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.040. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
4
Deriving a GPS Monitoring Time Recommendation for Physical Activity Studies of Adults.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 May;49(5):939-947. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001190.
5
Observational Park-based physical activity studies: A systematic review of the literature.
Prev Med. 2016 Aug;89:257-277. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
6
The First National Study of Neighborhood Parks: Implications for Physical Activity.
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.021. Epub 2016 May 18.
7
Socioeconomic and race/ethnic disparities in observed park quality.
BMC Public Health. 2016 May 12;16:395. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3055-4.
9
Association of proximity and density of parks and objectively measured physical activity in the United States: A systematic review.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Aug;138:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.034. Epub 2015 May 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验