Wong Ying J
Department of Cariology and Comprehensive Care, New York University, College of Dentistry, New York, USA.
Evid Based Dent. 2019 Mar;20(1):20-21. doi: 10.1038/s41432-019-0014-9.
Data sources PubMed, EBSCOhost and Scopus database up till 9 September 2017 in English language. Clinical trial registry and reference lists of published systematic reviews, textbooks and selected articles were also searched.Study selection Population-based randomised clinical trials comparing effects of any single NSAID versus placebo as an oral premedication on the efficacy of IANB in achieving anaesthesia in patients ranging from age 14-68 with irreversible pulpitis who were undergoing nonsurgical root canal therapy in mandibular posterior teeth.Data extraction and synthesis Studies were selected, reviewed and extracted by two independent reviewers using a standardised extraction form. They assessed risk of bias using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomised Trials (ROB 2.0). Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. I was used to evaluate heterogeneity. A subgroup analysis was conducted to investigate the dose-response effect of ibuprofen. Sensitivity analyses were performed by restricting studies with a low risk of bias and by using a fixed effects model (using STATA 14.1 software). Publication bias was assessed using funnel plot asymmetry and Egger regression tests. Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) was conducted to assess the risk of random errors and to determine the required sample size, which helped to evaluate if evidence is conclusive. Quality of evidence was rated by GRADE pro GDT software.Results Thirteen randomised clinical studies that investigated the efficacy of oral premedication (30-60 minutes prior) with a single NSAID in promoting the anaesthetic success of IANBs involving 1,174 patients between the age of 14 to 68 were included. Of these, 1,034 were evaluated as a comparison to placebo while the remainder were comparisons to various medications.Among the 13 RCTs, eight showed a low risk of bias, four trials showed a high risk and the remaining one showed unclear risk. For all studies, intervention provision and outcome measurement were performed at the same visit with no follow-up periods. Of the 1,034 participants, 493 (47.6%) reported successful anaesthetic outcomes. Quantitative pooling of the results showed that the use of any NSAID significantly increased the anaesthetic success of IANB compared with placebo (RR=1.96; 95% CI, 1.63-2.35; I= 6.8%).Subgroup analysis of nine trials showed that ibuprofen, diclofenac 50mg and ketorolac 10mg had a statistically significantly effect in increasing the anaesthetic success of IANBs compared with placebo (RR= 1.83, 95% CI, 1.43-2.35, I= 20.8%; RR= 2.56, 95% CI, 1.46-4.50, I= 44.8%; and RR= 2.07, 95% CI, 1.47-2.90, I=0% respectively). While Ibuprofen >400mg was significantly more effective than placebo (RR= 1.85; 95% CI, 1.39-2.45; I=26.7%), ibuprofen <400mg showed no statistical association (RR=1.78; 95% CI, 0.90-3.55; I=38.70%). Funnel plot showed low publication bias. GRADE evaluation showed that the accumulated evidence for premedication with NSAIDs demonstrated high quality. I results showed a low heterogeneity among trials. TSA concluded that the results of the meta-analyses showing premedication with NSAIDs increased the success rate of IANB anaesthesia were valid.Conclusions High quality evidence demonstrated that the oral premedication with NSAIDs increases the success rate of IANB in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
截至2017年9月9日的PubMed、EBSCOhost和Scopus数据库,语言限定为英文。还检索了临床试验注册库以及已发表的系统评价、教科书和选定文章的参考文献列表。
基于人群的随机临床试验,比较任何一种单一非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)与安慰剂作为口服术前用药,对年龄在14 - 68岁、患有不可逆性牙髓炎且正在接受下颌后牙非手术根管治疗的患者进行下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉(IANB)的效果。
由两名独立 reviewers 使用标准化提取表对研究进行选择、审查和提取。他们使用修订后的Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险工具(ROB 2.0)评估偏倚风险。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。I 用于评估异质性。进行亚组分析以研究布洛芬的剂量 - 反应效应。通过限制偏倚风险低的研究并使用固定效应模型(使用STATA 14.1软件)进行敏感性分析。使用漏斗图不对称性和Egger回归检验评估发表偏倚。进行试验序贯分析(TSA)以评估随机误差风险并确定所需样本量,这有助于评估证据是否确凿。证据质量由GRADE pro GDT软件评定。
纳入了13项随机临床研究,这些研究调查了在术前30 - 60分钟使用单一NSAID进行口服预处理对IANB麻醉成功率的影响,涉及1174例年龄在14至68岁之间的患者。其中,1034例被评估为与安慰剂进行比较,其余为与各种药物进行比较。
在这13项随机对照试验(RCT)中,8项显示偏倚风险低,4项试验显示偏倚风险高,其余1项显示风险不明确。对于所有研究,干预措施的提供和结果测量均在同一次就诊时进行,无随访期。在1034名参与者中,493名(47.6%)报告麻醉结果成功。结果的定量汇总表明,与安慰剂相比,使用任何NSAID均显著提高了IANB的麻醉成功率(RR = 1.96;95% CI,1.63 - 2.35;I = 6.8%)。
对9项试验的亚组分析表明,与安慰剂相比,布洛芬、50mg双氯芬酸和10mg酮咯酸在提高IANB麻醉成功率方面具有统计学显著效果(RR分别为1.83,95% CI,1.43 - 2.35,I = 20.8%;RR = 2.56,95% CI,1.46 - 4.50,I = 44.8%;RR = 2.07,95% CI,1.47 - 2.90,I = 0%)。虽然布洛芬>400mg比安慰剂显著更有效(RR = 1.85;95% CI,1.39 - 2.45;I = 26.7%),但布洛芬<400mg未显示出统计学关联(RR = 1.78;95% CI,0.90 - 3.55;I = 38.70%)。漏斗图显示发表偏倚较低。GRADE评估表明,NSAIDs术前用药的累积证据显示质量高。I结果显示试验间异质性低。TSA得出结论,荟萃分析显示NSAIDs术前用药提高IANB麻醉成功率的结果是有效的。
高质量证据表明,NSAIDs口服术前用药可提高不可逆性牙髓炎患者IANB的成功率。