1Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery.
2Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine.
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Apr 1;46(4):E8. doi: 10.3171/2019.1.FOCUS18645.
OBJECTIVEEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and multimodal analgesia are established care models that minimize perioperative opioid consumption and promote positive outcomes after spine surgery. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is an emerging technique that may achieve similar goals. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an OFA regimen within an ERAS pathway for lumbar decompressive surgery and to compare perioperative opioid requirements in a matched cohort of patients managed with traditional opioid-containing anesthesia (OCA).METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. They included 36 patients who underwent lumbar decompression under their ERAS pathway for spinal decompression between February and August 2018. Eighteen patients who received OFA were matched in a 1:1 ratio to a cohort managed with a traditional OCA regimen. The primary outcome was total perioperative opioid consumption. Postoperative pain scores (measured using the numerical rating scale [NRS]), opioid consumption (total morphine equivalents), and length of stay (time to readiness for discharge) were compared in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). The authors also assessed compliance with ERAS process measures and compared compliance during 3 phases of care: pre-, intra-, and postoperative.RESULTSThere was a significant reduction in total perioperative opioid consumption in patients who received OFA (2.43 ± 0.86 oral morphine equivalents [OMEs]; mean ± SEM), compared to patients who received OCA (38.125 ± 6.11 OMEs). There were no significant differences in worst postoperative pain scores (NRS scores 2.55 ± 0.70 vs 2.58 ± 0.73) or opioid consumption (5.28 ± 1.7 vs 4.86 ± 1.5 OMEs) in the PACU between OFA and OCA groups, respectively. There was a clinically significant decrease in time to readiness for discharge from the PACU associated with OFA (37 minutes), although this was not statistically significantly different. The authors found high overall compliance with ERAS process measures (91.4%) but variation in compliance according to phase of care. The highest compliance occurred during the preoperative phase (94.71% ± 2.88%), and the lowest compliance occurred during the postoperative phase of care (85.4% ± 5.7%).CONCLUSIONSOFA within an ERAS pathway for lumbar spinal decompression represents an opportunity to minimize perioperative opioid exposure without adversely affecting pain control or recovery. This study reveals opportunities for patient and provider education to reinforce ERAS and highlights the postoperative phase of care as a time when resources should be focused to increase ERAS adherence.
加速康复外科(ERAS)和多模式镇痛是减少围手术期阿片类药物使用并促进脊柱手术后积极结果的既定护理模式。无阿片类药物麻醉(OFA)是一种新兴技术,可能达到类似的目标。本研究旨在评估腰椎减压手术中 ERAS 途径中的 OFA 方案,并比较接受传统含阿片类药物麻醉(OCA)管理的患者的围手术期阿片类药物需求。
作者对前瞻性收集的数据进行了回顾性分析。他们纳入了 2018 年 2 月至 8 月期间在其 ERAS 途径下接受腰椎减压术的 36 名患者。18 名接受 OFA 的患者与接受传统 OCA 方案管理的患者进行了 1:1 匹配。主要结局是总围手术期阿片类药物消耗。比较术后疼痛评分(使用数字评分量表[NRS]测量)、阿片类药物消耗(总吗啡当量)和术后恢复室(PACU)中的住院时间(准备出院时间)。作者还评估了 ERAS 过程措施的依从性,并比较了 3 个护理阶段的依从性:术前、术中和术后。
与接受 OCA 的患者(38.125±6.11 口服吗啡当量[OME])相比,接受 OFA 的患者的总围手术期阿片类药物消耗显著减少(2.43±0.86 OME)。两组患者在 PACU 中术后疼痛评分(NRS 评分 2.55±0.70 vs 2.58±0.73)或阿片类药物消耗(5.28±1.7 vs 4.86±1.5 OME)均无显著差异。OFA 与 OCA 组患者从 PACU 准备出院的时间分别为 37 分钟和 45 分钟,具有临床意义的缩短,尽管差异无统计学意义。作者发现,OFA 与 PACU 中准备出院时间的显著缩短有关(37 分钟),尽管这在统计学上无显著差异。作者发现 ERAS 过程措施的总体依从率很高(91.4%),但根据护理阶段的不同,依从率也存在差异。术前阶段的依从率最高(94.71%±2.88%),术后阶段的依从率最低(85.4%±5.7%)。
腰椎脊柱减压术的 ERAS 途径中的 OFA 方案代表了减少围手术期阿片类药物暴露而不影响疼痛控制或恢复的机会。本研究揭示了患者和提供者教育的机会,以加强 ERAS,并强调了术后护理阶段是增加 ERAS 依从性的资源重点的时间。